Climate change and control of the southeastern Bering Sea pelagic ecosystem

Abstract

We propose a new hypothesis, the Oscillating Control Hypothesis (OCH), which predicts that pelagic ecosystem function in the southeastern Bering Sea will alternate between primarily bottom-up control in cold regimes and primarily top-down control in warm regimes. The timing of spring primary production is determined predominately by the timing of ice retreat. Late ice retreat (late March or later) leads to an early, ice-associated bloom in cold water (e.g., 1995, 1997, 1999), whereas no ice, or early ice retreat before mid-March, leads to an open-water bloom in May or June in warm water (e.g., 1996, 1998, 2000). Zooplankton populations are not closely coupled to the spring bloom, but are sensitive to water temperature. In years when the spring bloom occurs in cold water, low temperatures limit the production of zooplankton, the survival of larval/juvenile fish, and their recruitment into the populations of species of large piscivorous fish, such as walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma), Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus) and arrowtooth flounder (Atheresthes stomias). When continued over decadal scales, this will lead to bottom-up limitation and a decreased biomass of piscivorous fish. Alternatively, in periods when the bloom occurs in warm water, zooplankton populations should grow rapidly, providing plentiful prey for larval and juvenile fish. Abundant zooplankton will support strong recruitment of fish and will lead to abundant predatory fish that control forage fish, including, in the case of pollock, their own juveniles. Piscivorous marine birds and pinnipeds may achieve higher production of young and survival in cold regimes, when there is less competition from large piscivorous fish for coldwater forage fish such as capelin (Mallotus villosus). Piscivorous seabirds and pinnipeds also may be expected to have high productivity in periods of transition from cold regimes to warm regimes, when young of large predatory species of fish are numerous enough to provide forage. The OCH predicts that the ability of large predatory fish populations to sustain fishing pressure will vary between warm and cold regimes.The OCH points to the importance of the timing of ice retreat and water temperatures during the spring bloom for the productivity of zooplankton, and the degree and direction of coupling between zooplankton and forage fish. in the biomass of large piscivorous fish and a concurrent decline in the biomass of forage fish, including age-1 walleye pollock, particularly over the southern portion of the shelf. Populations of northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) and seabirds such as kittiwakes (Rissa spp.) at the Pribilof Islands have declined, most probably in response to a diminished prey base. The available evidence suggests that these changes are unlikely the result of a decrease in total annual new primary production, though the possibility of reduced post-bloom production during summer remains. An ecosystem approach to management of the Bering Sea and its fisheries is of great importance if all o...

Trophic cascades promote threshold-like shifts in pelagic marine ecosystems

“…2) and become the main forcing of zooplankton variations. Overall, this emphasizes that changes in ecosystem functioning can be a result of variations at the higher trophic levels directly affected by human exploitation, and not merely the consequence of climate change (17,18). Specifically, and in contrast to what has been shown in other systems (27), in the Baltic Sea the changes in the dynamic properties of zooplankton were not directly related to climate-driven hydrological variations, but rather to an alteration of the interaction strength between highly harvested species (piscivore cod and planktivore sprat).…”

“…16). However, empirical evidence showing temporal shifts between the 2 opposite processes of trophic control are extremely rare in open marine ecosystems, and they typically have been related to the direct effect of contrasting climate regimes (17,18).…”

Middle to late Holocene paleoproductivity reconstructions for the western Barents Sea: a model-data comparison

“…This provides an increased area for algal growth and a longer growing season leading to increased production [2,11]. Earlier blooms are not limited by grazers and the potential for higher vertical flux to sediments is increased [22,37]. The overall effect of these counteracting processes is as of yet unclear.…”

Changes in phytoplankton community structure during wind-induced fall bloom on the central Chukchi shelf

“…In the Beaufort Sea, episodic fall blooms have obvious impact on the recruitment of secondary producers (Tremblay et al 2011). Similarly, yearly changes in the timing of the spring bloom have significant impact on the production of higher trophic level organisms through the food web in the Bering Sea (reviewed in Hunt et al 2002Hunt et al , 2011. The impact on secondary producers as a whole remains unknown because the grazing experiments were conducted only for C. glacialis C5, even though they comprise one-third of the total mesozooplankton abundance.…”