Development agencies of the future: The limits of adaptation

Abstract

The analysis of the future of development agencies commonly adopts a view that the adaptability of agencies to a set of external challenges in the global development landscape determines their fitness for the future. This article offers alternative entry points for reflections on the future role of development agencies in managing global challenges. It argues that recent analysis focusing on agency adaptation has two key limitations. First, it does not adequately account for the existing diversity of organizational forms and the differences in the functions that development agencies assume.Second, it does not acknowledge that agency adaptation can reflect organizational dynamics involving the pursuit of sustained legitimacy rather than a rational response to external challenges. As a consequence, agencies encouraged to change in order to maintain relevance may extend their engagement to areas where they lack expertise, implying a tradeoff between organizational adaptation and effectiveness. The article concludes that further analysis of possible trajectories for development agencies should emphasize the place of organizations within a domestic and international division of labor and the varied strengths of current organizational alternatives to orient future decisions on how to invest in the infrastructure for global cooperation. KEYWORDS aid effectiveness, bureaucracy, development agencies, development aid, future of development cooperation, organizational change

Governance approach to policy implementation challenges and sustainable development: Conceptual implications from the Nigerian case of TraderMoni empowerment scheme

“…Leonard (2010) goes further to stress that there are handful of institutions even in developing states which can be trusted also to deliver adequately. Institutions must demonstrate adaptability to the external impulses coming to them (Lundsgaarde & Fejerskov, 2018), so as to be a better position to participation societal development. A more specific survey has been made and it was observed that political parties (Brouard et al, 2018), bureaucrats (Cooper, 2018), managers (Rauh, 2016, and institutional structure (Egeberg & Stigen, 2018) have significant impact on policy processes.…”

The impacts of marketization on international aid: Transforming relationships among USAID vendors

“…External pressures and donor agency support for greater private sector engagement influence ongoing discussions about aid distribution, its purpose and future direction within aid agencies themselves. In the US experience, domestic policies impact not only the process of aid distribution but also agency structure and division of labor where 21 different agencies hold responsibility for aid distribution (Lundsgaarde & Fejerskov, 2018). It is the division of responsibility within and across these multiple agencies that directly shapes engagement between USAID vendors, specifically for-profit firms and NGOs.…”