2015
DOI: 10.1080/00045608.2015.1012635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing Implicit Uncertainty Visualization Methods Motivated by Theories in Decision Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Projected change and projected average are presented as three separate but connected map displays: the multimodel mean (the center map) and the values two standard deviations above and below the mean (the right and left maps, respectively). This three-map layout was proposed and tested as a possible framework to more effectively communicate model spread and interpretation of uncertainty based on the authors experience and the finding by Kinkeldey et al (2014), Deitrick (2012), Deitrick and Wentz (2015), and Kinkeldey et al (2015).…”
Section: B Design Of the Communication Elements Of The Dssmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Projected change and projected average are presented as three separate but connected map displays: the multimodel mean (the center map) and the values two standard deviations above and below the mean (the right and left maps, respectively). This three-map layout was proposed and tested as a possible framework to more effectively communicate model spread and interpretation of uncertainty based on the authors experience and the finding by Kinkeldey et al (2014), Deitrick (2012), Deitrick and Wentz (2015), and Kinkeldey et al (2015).…”
Section: B Design Of the Communication Elements Of The Dssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these resources have three primary limitations that we find are critical to communicating future climate projections: 1) Single maps are used, which suggests erroneously that a single future climate projection might be appropriately used for decision-making instead of a spread of possible future climates across the downscaled GCMs. While this specific example is focused on climate projections, others have found similar issues in visualizing uncertainty in geospatial data such as Kinkeldey et al (2014), Deitrick (2012), Deitrick and Wentz (2015), and Kinkeldey et al (2015). 2) City-and location-specific values are not easily communicated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The representation of imperfect information and its effect on decision-making has been cited for several years as a challenge in terms of information visualization and geovisualization (Çöltekin et al, 2017). Proposals regarding its representation are numerous (MacEachren, 1992;MacEachren et al, 2005;Deitrick & Wentz, 2015;Koo et al, 2018) but not all of them seems to be adopted as unanimously as other traditional semiology features.…”
Section: Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mishra et al (23)(24)(25) are among the few to have considered the general information needs of decisionmakers in crises. Deitrick and Wentz (26) reflect on the different needs of scientists and decisionmakers in working with geographical uncertainty, recognizing that scientists are interested more in the uncertainties arising from their data, while decisionmakers are more interested in the uncertainties about what their actions may achieve. One question is whether it is better to use qualitative or quantitative expressions of uncertainty.…”
Section: Communicating Risks To Decisionmakersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been some previous suggestions for displaying uncertainty relating to paths and strengths of plumes in the context of a radiation accident. (39,52,53) These suggestions provided an action focus within the plots, indicating the uncertainty of thresholds above which countermeasures should be implemented: Deitrick and Wentz (26) suggestion that decision making requires attention primarily to what one can or should do. Haywood (39) suggested the plotting of multiple plumes generated by sampling from the probability distributions of the source term and the weather predictions, to show the alternative outcomes from different assumptions in source term strength, release duration, and weather evolution.…”
Section: Communicating Geographical Risk and Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%