2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4797(03)00133-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing environmental quality standards for various pesticides and priority pollutants for French freshwaters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past decade, as public concern has focused on the possible impacts of pesticides on the environment, several European and North American countries (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14) have defined specific water quality criteria (WQC) for each pesticide in surface waters. Within the EU, these WQC are often equivalent to the predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC), which aims to ensure the overall protection of aquatic life (9,12,14). This parameter is usually estimated by finding the lowest reliable aquatic effect concentration and applying a safety factor to account for various uncertainties, such as interspecies differences in sensitivity, acute-to-chronic ratios, and laboratory-to-field extrapolations (for review see refs 15-17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decade, as public concern has focused on the possible impacts of pesticides on the environment, several European and North American countries (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14) have defined specific water quality criteria (WQC) for each pesticide in surface waters. Within the EU, these WQC are often equivalent to the predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC), which aims to ensure the overall protection of aquatic life (9,12,14). This parameter is usually estimated by finding the lowest reliable aquatic effect concentration and applying a safety factor to account for various uncertainties, such as interspecies differences in sensitivity, acute-to-chronic ratios, and laboratory-to-field extrapolations (for review see refs 15-17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results show that the decline in chronic ecological risk from TBT and TPhT after implementation of the AFS Convention has not been robust. For TBT, all RQ values were greater than 1, with a maximum of 59.84 [51]; therefore, TBT posed a significant chronic ecological risk to aquatic organisms in the TGR, and may cause chronic toxicity in aquatic organisms [4,8,32,51,64], such as oyster calcification abnormalities [1] and weight loss and imposex in snails [30]. For TPhT, most RQ values were greater than 1, with a maximum of 16.83 [52].…”
Section: Ecological Risk Assessment Of Tbt and Tpht For Organisms In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rapid development of agriculture and aquaculture in China, the application of TPhT as a fungicide The risk quotient (RQ) values of TBT and TPhT for organisms in the TGR before and after the implementation of the AFS Convention with different water quality criteria and risk thresholds [1,4,8,12,18,23,24,30,32,51,52,64,70,77,80]…”
Section: Health Risks From Tbt and Tpht To The Population Of The Tgrrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…candidate countries. This legislation requires monitoring of priority and non-priority chemicals discharged in significant quantities [1].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of the legislation has been harmonized with EU legislation, but has so far not been fully implemented so far. Currently, monitoring the quality of surface water in Serbia is conducted by the Serbian Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) and contains: (1) results of an examination of biological elements for evaluation of ecological status of surface water;…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%