2014
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing biases

Abstract: German nouns may alternate from singular to plural in two different ways. Some singular forms that end in a voiceless obstruent have a plural in which this obstruent is voiced. Another alternation concerns the vowel. Some singular forms with a back vowel have a plural form in which this back vowel is front. For each noun it has to be established individually whether it alternates or not. The voicing alternation is phonetically grounded, but the vowel alternation is not. Knowledge about such alternations involv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present findings raise an important methodological point. To investigate morphological production, studies use wug tests in which one form is used in order to make a participant produce another form (Berko-Gleason, 1958;van de Vijver & Baer-Henney, 2014). In addition to being a very meta-linguistic task, this method may leave participants stumped in case of languages such as Maltese.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present findings raise an important methodological point. To investigate morphological production, studies use wug tests in which one form is used in order to make a participant produce another form (Berko-Gleason, 1958;van de Vijver & Baer-Henney, 2014). In addition to being a very meta-linguistic task, this method may leave participants stumped in case of languages such as Maltese.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As predicted on the basis of evidence from Russian (Ceytlin, 2000, 2006) and Dutch (Zamuner et al, 2011), at the age of 4 children do not yet show systematic sensitivity to nominal morphophonological patterns. The process of morphophonological development is likely to be additionally influenced by children’s vocabulary size (van de Vijver & Baer-Henney, 2014). Thus, in Figures 1 and 2 we observe that only at the age of 5 did the children in this study start treating real and nonce words differently, suggesting that children below that age do not yet have enough experience in using these forms to make generalisations about the morphophonological patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some researchers report that certain morphophonemic alternations are acquired relatively early (e.g., vowel harmony in the accusative suffix in Turkish, Aksu-Koç, & Slobin, 1985; vowel and consonant alternations in Northern Saami, Bals, 2004;vowel alternations in European Portuguese, Fikkert & Freitas, 2006), others have claimed that adult-like mastery does not emerge until relatively late (Pierrehumbert, 2003). A number of factors, such as phonetic grounding, frequency, locality, amount of exposure, and knowledge of abstract features, have been shown to influence the acquisition process and generalization behavior (Baer-Henney & van de Vijver, 2012;Cristia & Seidl, 2008;van de Vijver & Baer-Henney, 2014;Wilson, 2006). Buckler and Fikkert (2016) investigated how voicing alternations are represented in the lexicon of Dutch and German 3-year-olds.…”
Section: The Acquisition Of German Final Devoicingmentioning
confidence: 99%