1996
DOI: 10.1080/01431169608949103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining uncertainties and their propagation in dynamic change detection based on classified remotely-sensed images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For successful change detection, a co-registration error of less than half a pixel is desired (Dai and Khorram 1998). It has been shown that even registration accuracy of better than one-fifth of a pixel can still lead to a CD error of approximately 10% (Dai and Khorram 1998;Khorram et al 1998;Shi and Ehlers 1996;Townshend et al 1992). However, it is highly unrealistic to achieve co-registration accuracies smaller than one pixel.…”
Section: Class Selection and Classification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For successful change detection, a co-registration error of less than half a pixel is desired (Dai and Khorram 1998). It has been shown that even registration accuracy of better than one-fifth of a pixel can still lead to a CD error of approximately 10% (Dai and Khorram 1998;Khorram et al 1998;Shi and Ehlers 1996;Townshend et al 1992). However, it is highly unrealistic to achieve co-registration accuracies smaller than one pixel.…”
Section: Class Selection and Classification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There are many change detection approaches developed for remotely sensed images (Singh 1989 Great Salt Lake dynamics 1817 1995, Dimyait et al 1996, Jensen 1996, Shi and Ehlers 1996, Mas 1999, Morisette et al 1999. Among these digital change detection techniques, the post-classification comparison method is particularly attractive because the nature of change can be identified.…”
Section: General Methodologymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is particularly true in highly dynamic landscapes where it is less reasonable to make specific assumptions about the rate of land-cover change and the observed land-cover change trajectories in the context of the magnitude of classification errors. Because of the inherent error in landcover classification maps derived from satellite imagery, special attention is needed in the development of products that are measurements of land-cover change (Shi and Ehlers 1996;Carmel et al 2001). A classification for a single time point includes some pixels that are correctly classified and some pixels that are incorrectly classified.…”
Section: Uncertainty Precision and Accuracy In Carbon Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%