2005
DOI: 10.1080/0143116042000298324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping and visualizing the Great Salt Lake landscape dynamics using multi‐temporal satellite images, 1972–1996

Abstract: This study focuses on monitoring and visualizing the Great Salt Lake dynamics from satellite images. Objectives of this research are to identify the Great Salt Lake and vicinity areas land cover types, to detect and quantify water and wetland dynamics, and to visualize these dynamics. Satellite imagery, including Landsat Multi-Spectral Scanner (MSS) and Thematic Mapper (TM) images, were obtained for the extent of the Great Salt Lake and vicinity from 1972 to 1996, with a three-year interval, except 1978 and 19… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these, the post-classification comparison method is particularly attractive due to its nature of clearly identified change (Hung and Wu 2005;Muttitanon and Tripathi 2005;Yuan et al 2005). This study employs the post-classification method to detect changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, the post-classification comparison method is particularly attractive due to its nature of clearly identified change (Hung and Wu 2005;Muttitanon and Tripathi 2005;Yuan et al 2005). This study employs the post-classification method to detect changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soft classification is generally a mixed pixel decomposition method [24,25]. This can be achieved by using techniques such as thematic classification [26,27], single band threshold [28,29], the spectral relationship method [30,31] and the water index method, which is the most commonly used method because of its specific application [27,32,33,34]. These methods make use of the reflectivity index of each band and provide water body information based on signature differences between water and other land surface features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional error matrix and kappa coefficient method have been commonly used in accuracy assessment of multi-temporal land-cover change detection (e.g. Mertens and Lambin 2000, Petit et al 2001, Hung and Wu 2005. However, as this method was developed for single-date thematic mapping (Biging et al 1999a), it only provides accuracy based on individual classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, multi-temporal remote sensing change detection is often based on data from different sensors with variable spatial and spectral resolutions (e.g. Griffith et al 2003, Yagoub 2004, Hung and Wu 2005. As the ability to delineate land-cover classes varies greatly with different image sources, boundary errors of detected change classes present more uncertainty than those based on data from the same sensor (Serra et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%