2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-25658-5_48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the Importance of Performance Measurement Criteria Based on Total Quality Management Using Fuzzy Analytical Network Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The outcomes of this model can be compared other studies employing different methodologies that exist in the TQM literature. FANP methodology utilized by Chen (2009) andÖ ztays¸i andKutlu (2011) to analyse the weights of TQM criteria considering interdependencies between them. The dynamic TQM factor interrelations obtained by FCM can be compared with static TQM factor weights determined by FANP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The outcomes of this model can be compared other studies employing different methodologies that exist in the TQM literature. FANP methodology utilized by Chen (2009) andÖ ztays¸i andKutlu (2011) to analyse the weights of TQM criteria considering interdependencies between them. The dynamic TQM factor interrelations obtained by FCM can be compared with static TQM factor weights determined by FANP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to determine the most affecting CSFs of TQM is a complex and difficult task when the dynamic interactions between the CSFs are considered. TQM literature focusing on the CSFs of TQM implementation involves many empirical studies such as statistical (Saraph et al, 1989;Black and Porter, 1996;Quazi et al, 1998), analytical (Pun, 2002;Chin et al, 2002;Bayazit and Karpak, 2007) and fuzzy (Chen and Chen, 2009;Ö ztays¸i and Kutlu, 2011), but the relations among the factors in a dynamic and uncertain environment are not taken into consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This combined method is developed based on some research, i.e. application of FANP in requirements in the house of quality [19], An IT project selection [20], Total Quality Management [21], and selection of facility location [22]. This combined method also considers some drawbacks of ANP [23][24][25] and enhance linguistic scale which is used in a pair wise comparison matrix for FANP based on the previous one [25], [27].…”
Section: Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuzzy ANP is developed to address the limitation of conventional ANP which becomes less effective when dealing with uncertainty. Steps in FANP method can be observed in various studies which apply it to solve various problems [8][9][10]. The process of calculating the weight of each parameter is started by constructing pair-wise comparison matrix (PCM), for comparing between parameters using linguistic variables.…”
Section: Review Of Rating Scale and Fanpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of calculating the weight of each parameter is started by constructing pair-wise comparison matrix (PCM), for comparing between parameters using linguistic variables. In some studies, fuzzy linguistic variables used in PCM are defined differently according to their requirement [9][10][11][12]. Furthermore, the global weight of each parameter is determined using Chang's Extents Analysis approach [8,13].…”
Section: Review Of Rating Scale and Fanpmentioning
confidence: 99%