2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.06.137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the crystallization kinetic parameters of Ge22.5Te77.5 glass using model-free and model-fitting methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(94 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum percentage difference of the effective activation energy obtained using Vyazovkin and KAS methods is less than 1%. This close agreement between Vyazovkin and KAS isoconversional methods was also reported by many authors [22,27,29,54,55]. Accordingly, this variation of the effective activation energy can be attributed to the variation of E eff.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Effective Activation Energy Of Crystallizasupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The maximum percentage difference of the effective activation energy obtained using Vyazovkin and KAS methods is less than 1%. This close agreement between Vyazovkin and KAS isoconversional methods was also reported by many authors [22,27,29,54,55]. Accordingly, this variation of the effective activation energy can be attributed to the variation of E eff.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Effective Activation Energy Of Crystallizasupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The application of DSC to the characterization of the phase transformations has been previously examined by several workers [19][20][21][22]. Studies of the transformation kinetics of amorphous materials under non-isothermal conditions can be performed using several different ways and interpretations [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dependence of E c on the fraction transformed is affected by changes in the nucleation and growth behavior during the crystallization process [24][25][26]. The local activation energy E c (a) is composed of two parts: the activation energy of nucleation (E n ) and the activation energy of growth (E g ) [27][28][29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abu-Sehly [23] has studied kinetics studies of crystallization of TeAsCu chalcogenide glasses, Elabbar et al [24] have studied the crystallization kinetics of PbSe chalcogenide glasses using DSC techniques, Soltan [25] has studied the pre-crystallization kinetics of PbSe glass, Mehta et al [26] have studied the glass transition phenomena in SeTe and SeGe based ternary chalcogenides glasses, Abd Elnaeim et al [27] have studied the glass transition and crystallization kinetics in InSeTe chalcogenide glasses. The work on glass transition temperature and thermal stability of SeSn chalcogenide glass by Omar et al [28], study of the glass transition in amorphous Se by Abu-Sehly et al [29], calorimetric studies of SeTeCd and SeTeCdIn multicomponent chalcogenide glasses by Kumar and Singh [30], phase transformation kinetics of SeGePb chalcogenide glass by Praveen et al [31], determination of crystallization parameters of GeTe glasses by El-Oyoun [32] are also worth mentioning. The studies on preparation and char- The contents were heated in a microprocessor-controlled programmable mue furnace, where the temperature was increased at 3 K/min up to 1273 K and kept at that temperature for 14 h with frequent rocking to ensure the homogenization of the melt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%