1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(05)80030-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of polymerization shrinkage kinetics in visible-light-cured materials: methods development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
109
0
12

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
8
109
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The extrapolated intensities in the sample surface were (301 ± 27) mW/cm 2 for Arabesk and (317 ± 6) mW/cm 2 for Grandio, indicating that more than one half of the introduced intensity is reflected at the surface. This is in line with findings of other researchers [41]. …”
Section: Light Transmission Measurementssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The extrapolated intensities in the sample surface were (301 ± 27) mW/cm 2 for Arabesk and (317 ± 6) mW/cm 2 for Grandio, indicating that more than one half of the introduced intensity is reflected at the surface. This is in line with findings of other researchers [41]. …”
Section: Light Transmission Measurementssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Since the development of VLC dental restoratives numerous studies have investigated the curing kinetics [7][8][9][10][11], the degree of cure (DC) [11][12][13][14] and the depth of cure (DC) [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. In order to get a better understanding of the curing process and its dependency on curing parameters such as curing time, light intensity, resin formulation, initiator system etc., various test methods have been applied in real time curing investigations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, measuring polymerization shrinkage in a clinically meaningful context is extremely difficult. Several experimental methods have been used to assess polymerization shrinkage including dilatometry, linear displacement, strain gauges, and the bonded disc method [8][9][10][11]. Each of these methods have advantages and disadvantages, but all are greatly influenced by the testing configuration (such as the direction of light, dimensions of the specimens, or specimen constraint) [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of a linometer has merits such as simple and easy application, and it is unaffected by temperature [4]. It has been reported that there are significant differences in the magnitude of polymerization shrinkage among commercially available composite materials [1][2][3][4]6]. In these shrinkage measurement studies, randomly selected composite portions in a syringe were measured four to eight times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%