1997
DOI: 10.1080/009841097160438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DETERMINATION OF o-CRESOL BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY AND COMPARISON WITH HIPPURIC ACID LEVELS IN URINE SAMPLES OF INDIVIDUALS EXPOSED TO TOLUENE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of analytical techniques have been used over the years to quantify o ‐cresol in hydrolyzed human urine. One widespread technique is gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC‐FID) 9–15 . Unfortunately, this technique often gives inconclusive results due to interference and limits of detection that are generally well above the current BEI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A variety of analytical techniques have been used over the years to quantify o ‐cresol in hydrolyzed human urine. One widespread technique is gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC‐FID) 9–15 . Unfortunately, this technique often gives inconclusive results due to interference and limits of detection that are generally well above the current BEI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One widespread technique is gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID). [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Unfortunately, this technique often gives inconclusive results due to interference and limits of detection that are generally well above the current BEI. Gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry detection 16,17 is also used, but it requires a stringent sample preparation procedure sensitive to water.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%