2015
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.7220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of florfenicol residues in broiler meat and liver samples using RP‐HPLC with UV–visible detection

Abstract: The results indicate the presence of FF residues in broiler meat and liver samples. Usage of this contaminated meat causes resistance in consumers and poses a public health threat. Thus there is a need to educate farmers about the ill effects of residual drugs on human health and their withdrawal times in poultry. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(26 reference statements)
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these isolates, 46% were found resistant to commonly used antibiotics (Saleem et al, 2014). Similar incidence of AMROs in ready to eat raw food items has also been reported in other parts of the country (Shah et al, 2012;Capita and Alonso-Calleja 2013;Siddiqui et al, 2015Nasim et al, 2016.…”
Section: Development Of Amr and Its Impactsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Of these isolates, 46% were found resistant to commonly used antibiotics (Saleem et al, 2014). Similar incidence of AMROs in ready to eat raw food items has also been reported in other parts of the country (Shah et al, 2012;Capita and Alonso-Calleja 2013;Siddiqui et al, 2015Nasim et al, 2016.…”
Section: Development Of Amr and Its Impactsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…All of meat samples have concentration of FF ranged between 106.1-707.28 μg/kg. The results of the present study can be confirmed by comparing with data from previous study (Nasim et al, 2016). According to current study, the residual concentration of FF is 164 much higher as compared to the previous study conducted by Zhang et al (2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Various extraction methods were employed to extract CAP, TAP, FF, and FFA from animal-derived foods. These methods included LLE, 10,12,17,19,20 fabric-phase sorptive extraction (FPSE), 11 matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD), 15,22 LLE-solid-phase extraction (LLE-SPE), 16,24,25 QuEChERS extraction, 18 SPE, 21 and subcritical water extraction (SWE). 23 The LLE method for extracting samples is simple, but it consumes a large quantity of reagents and takes a long time and is thus not suitable for batch processing of samples.…”
Section: Selection Of Extraction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, various methods have been used to measure CAP, TAP, FF, and FFA in animal-derived foods; these methods include the fluorescent microsphere lateral flow immunoassay (FM-LFA), 7 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), 8,9 reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (RP-HPLC-UVD), 10 HPLC with diode array detection (DAD), 11 RP-HPLC with fluorescence detection (FLD), 12 LC-mass spectrometry (MS), 13,14 LC tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), [15][16][17][18][19][20] ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC)-MS/ MS, [21][22][23][24] and gas chromatography-negative chemical ionization mass spectrometry (GC-NCI/MS). 25 In previous research, we developed an LC-MS/MS 20 method for the simultaneous determination of CAP, TAP, FF, and FFA in eggs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%