1987
DOI: 10.1016/0378-4347(87)80317-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of fentanyl and alfentanil in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Immunoassay [20][21][22][23], high-performance liquid chromatography combined with ultraviolet detection [24], and several gas chromatographic methods [25][26][27][28] have been described. More recent studies were mostly based on liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry [29] or liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) techniques [30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunoassay [20][21][22][23], high-performance liquid chromatography combined with ultraviolet detection [24], and several gas chromatographic methods [25][26][27][28] have been described. More recent studies were mostly based on liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry [29] or liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) techniques [30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method was modified for micro volumes from the method previously reported by Kumar et al [17]. Data acquisition was accomplished using Waters Millennium software.…”
Section: Measurement Of Fentanylmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the low plasma concentration of fentanyl after analgesic dose, the development of a sensitive assay, which enables the quantitation in the lower pg/mL range is required [1]. There were many analytical methods of fentanyl had been reported, such as LC/UV [2,3], GC/MS [4][5][6][7][8], immunoassay [9][10][11], LC/MS [12,13] and LC/MS/MS [14][15][16][17]. Among these methods, LC/UV and immunoassay methods show lack of sensitivity, low precision and tend to suffer from cross-interference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%