Objectives: To evaluate the functional outcomes in critically ill children with severe sepsis using the Pediatric Overall Performance Category scale and Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category scale and to evaluate the risk factors for “worse outcomes.” Design: Prospective observational cohort study. Setting: Tertiary care PICU from September 2017 to October 2019. Patients: One hundred twenty-one children with severe sepsis, 2 months to 17 years old, admitted to PICU. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Pediatric Overall Performance Category and Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category scores were recorded at admission, PICU discharge, at 3 months and 1 year after discharge. “New disability” was defined as Pediatric Overall Performance Category and Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category score change “from baseline score” by greater than or equal to 1 category. Risk factors for “worse outcomes” (defined as “death” or “new disability”) were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. At admission, 33% (n = 39) had mild to moderate “overall disability” (Pediatric Overall Performance Category) and 26% (n = 32) had mild to moderate “cognitive disability” (Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category). At PICU discharge (n = 89 children), 50.5% (n = 45) had “new disability” in overall function (Pediatric Overall Performance Category scores) and 28% (n = 25) had “new disability” in cognitive function (Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category scores). At 3 months follow-up (n = 85 children), “new disability” at PICU discharge improved in 65% (n = 28/43) and 50% (n = 12/24) of those with “overall disability” (Pediatric Overall Performance Category) and “cognitive disability” (Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category), respectively. At 1-year follow-up (n = 84 children), only 5% (n = 2/43) had residual “new disability” in overall function (Pediatric Overall Performance Category) and 14% (n = 3/21) had residual “new disability” in cognitive function. PICU mortality was 26% (n = 32). The proportion with “worse outcomes” was 64% (n = 77). Risk factors for worse outcomes on univariate analysis included higher Pediatric Index of Mortality-3 scores, day 1 pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the ICU stay, and treatments received such as ventilation and Vasoactive-Inotrope Score. On multivariate analysis, only day 1 pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the ICU stay were found to be statistically significant. Conclusions: Children with severe sepsis had significant “new onset” mild to moderate functional disability at PICU discharge, and most of these children recovered within 1 year after PICU discharge. Day 1 pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and patient receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the ICU stay were found to be the significant risk factors of “worse outcomes.”

A 48-yr-old female presented with a 1-yr history of pain in the hypochondrium and epigastrium. All routine investigations and computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen were done. CT findings revealed a well-defined cystic mass in the right ovary, and ascitis with features suggestive of secondaries over the omentum and peritoneal surface. The serum CA125 was 1255 U/mL (normal range 0-35 U/mL), which was indicative of ovarian malignancy. An exploratory laparotomy was performed. Histopathological examination of organs revealed the presence of granuloma. The patient was advised to undergo antitubercular treatment (ATT) and follow-up every month. After 1 mo of ATT, the CA125 level came down to 42 U/mL, which was near normal. As tuberculosis requires only a conservative management, we suggest that in cases of abdominopelvic mass with or without ascitis, high serum CA125 should always raise a suspicion of tuberculosis and a laparoscopy combined with peritoneal biopsy should be performed to confirm the diagnosis. This will prevent unnecessary laparotomies. Moreover, serum CA125 can be used to monitor the response of disease to antitubercular treatment.

Masses in and around pancreas constitute an important clinical entity in gastrointestinal surgical practice. Most common being adenocarcinoma of head of pancreas followed by inflammatory masses due to chronic pancreatitis. Accurate diagnosis is of central importance as therapeutic strategies range from observation to complete surgical removal including total pancreatectomy.Several tumor markers are available which could help in prognostication and diagnosis of carcinoma pancreas. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA 19-9) is traditionally accepted best marker available. The role of new tumor marker platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) has been defined recently in prognostication of carcinoma pancreas. Role of PLR in diagnosing and its efficacy after combining it with CA 19-9 is not known. The aim of study was to assess the demographics of histologically proven neoplastic and inflammatory pancreatic head masses in our department. To assess the role of CA19-9 and platelet lymphocyte ratio(PLR) in determining nature of pancreatic head mass. Data consisted of histologically proven 45 patients .23 having head mass due to chronic pancreatitis and 22 because of neoplastic lesions. Demographics in terms of age, sex, previous pain episodes, presence of jaundice, history of alcohol intake were compared in both groups. Also tumor markers CA 19-9 and PLR individually and in combination were compared in both groups. Cancer pancreas significantly (p<0.001) occurred in older age group, was significantly associated with jaundice (p00.005) and weight loss (p<0.001). Accuracy in diagnosis of cancer pancreas was similar with CA 19-9 and PLR (68.89 %), where as combining CA 19-9 with PLR showed increased sensitivity(81.82 %) and accuracy(71.11 %) in diagnosing cancer pancreas. Other combinations showed no advantage. PLR is at least as good as CA 19-9 as diagnostic marker to differentiate between malignant and inflammatory head mass of pancreas.

No abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the proportion of children fulfilling “Sepsis-3” definition and International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference definition among children diagnosed to have septic shock and compare the mortality risk between the two groups. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: PICU of a tertiary care teaching hospital from 2014 to 2017. Patients: Children (≤ 17 yr old) with a diagnosis of septic shock at admission or during PICU stay. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: We applied both International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference and the new “Sepsis-3” definition (sepsis with hypotension requiring vasopressors and a lactate value of ≥ 2 mmol/L) to identify cases of septic shock by these definitions. Key outcomes such as mortality, proportion attaining shock reversal at 24 hours and organ dysfunction were compared between those fulfilling “Sepsis-3” definitions (“Sepsis-3” group) and those fulfilling “International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference” definition (“International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference” group). A total of 216 patients fulfilled International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference definitions of septic shock. Of these, only 104 (48%; 95% CI, 42–55) fulfilled “Sepsis-3” definition. Children fulfilling “Sepsis-3 plus International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference definitions” (“Sepsis-3 and International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference” group) had lower proportion with shock resolution (61% vs 82%; relative risk, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62–0.88) and higher risk of multiple organ dysfunction (85% vs 68%; 1.24; 1.07–1.45) at 24 hours. The mortality was 48.5% in “Sepsis-3 and International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference” group as compared with 37.5% in the “International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference only” group (relative risk, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.94–1.75). Conclusions: Less than half of children with septic shock identified by International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference definitions were observed to fulfill the criteria for shock as per “Sepsis-3” definitions. Lack of difference in the risk of mortality between children who fulfilled “Sepsis-3” definition and those who did not fulfill the definition raises questions on the appropriateness of using this definition for diagnosis of septic shock in children.