1996
DOI: 10.2172/405744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination analysis of energy conservation standards for distribution transformers

Abstract: This report has been reproduced directly from the best availaMe copy. This report contains information to assist the U.S. Department of Energy in making a determination on the feasibility and significance of energy conservation for distribution transformers as required by par. (a)( 1) above. The potential energy savings presented in this document are preliminary estimates appropriate for a determination study. Subsequent studies on this topic will involve more exact, detailed analysis on the effects of energy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(2 reference statements)
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower power consumption after retrofit reduces the load on the transformers, thereby reducing their losses. Since this savings is not measured in building-level data, it is expected that savings measured at the feeder level will be somewhat higher (Barnes et al 1996). …”
Section: Level-2 Energy Savingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower power consumption after retrofit reduces the load on the transformers, thereby reducing their losses. Since this savings is not measured in building-level data, it is expected that savings measured at the feeder level will be somewhat higher (Barnes et al 1996). …”
Section: Level-2 Energy Savingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of a definitive source for this breakout, it has been based on information from discussions with and informd information provided by transformer manufacturers. The loss characteristics describing utility transformers are probably more reliable than those for nonutilities because of the additional information from utility surveys (Barnes et al 1996).…”
Section: Base Case Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4.3.3. Sources: Barnes et al 1994Barnes et al ,1996; NEMA letters to P. R. Barnes, September 15, 1995, andOctober 28, 1996; EEI utility survey (see Barnes 1994, Appendix A); and ORNLMEMA surveys of manufacturers in…”
Section: -2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations