Determinants of corruption pressures on local government in the E.U.

Abstract

This article investigates corruption pressures at the sub-national government level by employing a novel approach of empirically assessing the subjective opinions of local councillors about corruption risks they have been exposed to. Based on the large survey data collected in 14 European countries we provide evidence that individual perceptions of corruption risk experienced by local councillors are formed by their personal characteristics, where educational attainment stands as the most significant deterrent to corruption risk. The comparative assessment of non-transition and post-transition countries (PTCs) shows that respondents from PTCs exhibit higher levels of perceived corruption pressures on the local government level (PCL). In non-transition countries, councillors in the local government units with more fiscal power are more exposed to corruption. When government effectiveness is included, the effect of transition process and local fiscal decentralisation loses significance. Government effectiveness appears to be a strong tool to alleviate the corruption pressure at the local government level, in particular for younger councillors in PTCs The findings shed more light on the issues of corruption, which is a striking problem at the sub-national government level in the E.U. Policy implications and suggestions for future research are offered.

How Government Size Expansion Can Affect Green Innovation—An Empirical Analysis of Data on Cross-Country Green Patent Filings

“…Government expansion may also result in government influence in areas that should be characterized by “governance by inaction.” Indeed, the negative impact of such excessive intervention on green innovation has been noted in the literature [ 39 ]. In addition, bloated organs, redundant personnel, power rent-seeking, and other problems caused by government overexpansion have increased tax burdens and aggravated corruption [ 40 ], resulting in a crowding-out effect harming green innovation [ 41 ] and inhibiting a country’s green innovation output. In other words, with continued government expansion, a country’s green innovation capacity will show an inverted U-shaped relationship (i.e., rising first and then falling).…”

Do effective public governance and gender (in)equality matter for poverty?

“…Corruption manifests in a variety of behaviours, such as public officials stealing funds from public coffers. Corruption constrains a country's social, economic and political development (Slijep cevi c et al, 2020), as it is a direct cause of income inequality and poverty (Maeda & Ziegfeld, 2015). Moreover, corruption reduces national revenue and wealth and increases government expenses (Chaudhry et al, 2006).…”

Post Decentralization Corruption: A study on perpetual corruption at the local level in West Lombok

“…The public's closeness with its local political structure makes it easier for collective resistance against corruption to unfold. Various information can be easily acquired and they can reach more local citizens than access to power or authority at the national level can (Manor, 2011;Slijepčević et al, 2020). In the Indonesian context, decentralization opens up spaces for public monitoring, and presents space for public aspirations functioning as a stage for public scrutiny of the government (Buehler, 2010;Ronald L. Holzhacker et al, 2016).…”