1983
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.149.2.6622683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of retained surgical sponges.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in cases that are suspected to involve a suppurative process, diffusion MRI should definitely be conducted. Likewise, patients with a history of spinal surgery, spinal abscesses, haematomas, hypertrophic scars, fibrosarcomas, rhabdomyosarcomas, and schwannomas should definitely be considered in the differential diagnosis and considered when planning diagnostic procedures (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35) (Table 2). In our cases, a history of previous operations and long-lasting symptoms made us consider foreign bodies left in the surgical site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in cases that are suspected to involve a suppurative process, diffusion MRI should definitely be conducted. Likewise, patients with a history of spinal surgery, spinal abscesses, haematomas, hypertrophic scars, fibrosarcomas, rhabdomyosarcomas, and schwannomas should definitely be considered in the differential diagnosis and considered when planning diagnostic procedures (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35) (Table 2). In our cases, a history of previous operations and long-lasting symptoms made us consider foreign bodies left in the surgical site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), corticosteroid drugs, and spinal instrumentation. 2,3,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Treatment of spinal abscess caused by retained surgical sponges consists of early diagnosis, surgical removal, and appropriate antibiotic treatment if necessary. However, we believe that the presence of foreign material as a nidus for infection precludes successful treatment of a spinal infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] A review of the literature concerning retained sponge following spinal surgery found only nine reports. 3,5,7,11,12,14,15) The incidence was reported as 0.7 per 10,000 patients but probably underestimates the actual incidence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surgical markers may become twisted or folded and present an unusual image. [3] For instance, in a report of 13 patients with a retained sponge the radio-opaque marker inside the sponge was seen in only 9 radiographs and even then was not immediately recognised for what it was. [4] Markers have been misinterpreted as calcifications, intestinal contrast material, wires or surgical clips.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%