2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of hepatitis E virus RNA in raw sausages and liver sausages from retail in Germany using an optimized method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
96
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
7
96
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The recovery rate was calculated after extraction of nucleic acids and quantification by the ddPCR method as the ratio between the number of genome copies of sample process control virus that were recovered to the number of genome copies used to spike the samples with. Overall the recovery rates in the studied samples varied from 0.06 to 14.36%, with the majority of samples (77% of pork pâtés, 86% of sausages, and 100% of raw pork livers) obtained a recovery rate of 1% or higher, which is consistent with the recovery rates obtained by others in similar food matrices (Berto et al 2013; Di Bartolo et al 2012, 2015; Szabo et al 2015, Wilhelm et al 2014). The recovery rates obtained from 3 pork livers that were spiked with HAV were 4.4, 4.6, and 7.9%.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The recovery rate was calculated after extraction of nucleic acids and quantification by the ddPCR method as the ratio between the number of genome copies of sample process control virus that were recovered to the number of genome copies used to spike the samples with. Overall the recovery rates in the studied samples varied from 0.06 to 14.36%, with the majority of samples (77% of pork pâtés, 86% of sausages, and 100% of raw pork livers) obtained a recovery rate of 1% or higher, which is consistent with the recovery rates obtained by others in similar food matrices (Berto et al 2013; Di Bartolo et al 2012, 2015; Szabo et al 2015, Wilhelm et al 2014). The recovery rates obtained from 3 pork livers that were spiked with HAV were 4.4, 4.6, and 7.9%.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Based on the tendencies found in our study (HEV IgG prevalence, serological evidence of (post)acute HEV infection) and the support from literature [38], we hypothesize that professional exposure to domestic pigs is a stronger risk factor than having occasional contact to wild boar when hunting. This can be explained by the remarkably high circulation of HEV in domestic pigs [54,[61][62][63][64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HEV-3 and HEV-4 RNA is present throughout the pork food chain worldwide [130,133,139,140,141,142,143]. Studies have reported that 3%–11% of pig liver samples at the slaughterhouse are HEV positive in France (4%) [144], the Netherlands (6.5%) [145], Czech Republic (5%) [141], Italy (6%) [140], Spain (3%) [140], the United Kingdom (3%) [146], Japan (5%) [147] and the US (11%) [148].…”
Section: Transmission Pathways Of Zoonotic Hevmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HEV RNA was also found in the liver of wild boars (5.8%), deer (3.2%) and wild rabbits (5%) hunted in southwestern France [149] and in the liver of wild boars (1.9%) hunted in north-western Italy [150]. HEV RNA has also been detected in pork sausages sold in the UK (10%) [146] and in Spain (6%) [140]; in ficatelli (30%), dried salted liver (3%), quenelle and quenelle paste (25%) and dried or fresh liver sausages (29%) sold in France [139]; in raw and dry liver sausages purchased in Italy [141], in raw sausages (20%) and liver sausages (22%) sold in Germany [142]; and in pork pâté and blood sausage (36%) sold in Brazil [151]. …”
Section: Transmission Pathways Of Zoonotic Hevmentioning
confidence: 99%