2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00430-017-0503-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Hepatitis E Virus (HEV)-antibody tests: a comparative analysis based on samples from individuals with direct contact to domestic pigs or wild boar in Germany

Abstract: In Europe, Hepatitis E virus (HEV) genotype 3 causes most human infections, and domestic pigs and wild boar represent the main reservoirs. Contact to these animals represents one source of human infection. However, interpretation of studies is challenged in the absence of a serological gold standard. Hence, this study compared results of different HEV immunoassays. Plasma samples from 139 individuals who had professional contact to pigs (veterinarians, meat inspectors, slaughterhouse workers; n = 114) or hunte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not necessarily true for immunocompetent hosts though. Although older serological assays for HEV diagnosis had come in disrepute due to their unacceptable performance, newer assays perform as shown in our and previous studies reasonably well [2,11,12,22]. According to our data, performing HEV PCR in immunocompetent hosts would be advisable only if the HEV serology (IgM or/and IgG) is positive.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is not necessarily true for immunocompetent hosts though. Although older serological assays for HEV diagnosis had come in disrepute due to their unacceptable performance, newer assays perform as shown in our and previous studies reasonably well [2,11,12,22]. According to our data, performing HEV PCR in immunocompetent hosts would be advisable only if the HEV serology (IgM or/and IgG) is positive.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Previous studies have evaluated the diagnostic performance of different serological assays for HEV IgG, IgM and to a lesser degree HEV IgA [11,12]. Variability in the performance of such assays is common [13][14][15][16], but false positive cases in healthy blood donors and false negative cases in patients with acute hepatitis seem to be rare [17,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swedish strains from most human cases with acute HEV and HEV from pigs and wild boar belong to subtype 3f in clade 3II (Norder et al, 2009;Roth et al, 2016). Zoonotic transmission of HEV by direct or indirect contact with infected animals, as pigs, may therefore be a further factor (Huang, Huang, Wagner, Chen, & Lu, 2018;Krumbholz et al, 2012Krumbholz et al, , 2014Sommerkorn, Schauer, Schreiner, Fickenscher, & Krumbholz, 2017) contributing to the surprisingly high seroprevalence in Sweden.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since, the study groups are blood donors in both studies, these conflicting results in anti‐HEV seropositivity might be explained by the low performance of the commercial ELISA assay (Euroimmun, Germany) used in the study. In this regard, two recent studies comparing assay performances of Euroimmun and Wantai ELISA assays reported a low assay performance of the Euroimmun assay compared with the Wantai ELISA . In Kayseri anti‐HEV seropositivity was determined as 8.2% and 7.4% with Wantai and Dia.Pro assays in the present study, respectively, although it was previously reported to be 1.6% in blood donors…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…6 Subsequent studies from Germany, France, Korea, and Australia comparing different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits confirmed the higher sensitivity of the Wantai assay. [7][8][9][10][11][12] In this study, new generation serological assays (Wantai, Beijing, China and Dia.Pro, Milan, Italy) utilizing total anti-HEV antibodies (Ab) based on HEVlike particles, including anti-HEV IgG, immunoglobulin M (IgM) and…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%