2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16435-4_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Copy-Rotate-Move Forgery Using Zernike Moments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
120
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
120
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the efficient block based methods which gave the most precise results [4] was presented in [8] during 2010. The work was aimed at detecting copy-rotate-move forgery using Zernike moments which have desirable properties like rotation invariance, robustness to noise etc.…”
Section: Block-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the efficient block based methods which gave the most precise results [4] was presented in [8] during 2010. The work was aimed at detecting copy-rotate-move forgery using Zernike moments which have desirable properties like rotation invariance, robustness to noise etc.…”
Section: Block-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can detect arbitrary variations in rotation and scaling in the copied part and is a processing scheme in which any suitable feature can be used in combination with the SATS post processing. It was tested in combination with the previous method of Ryu [8] and nearly 75% of the duplicated blocks with rotation were detected and the method was found to be accurate for JPEG compression with Q factor 50 to 100.…”
Section: Fig 2: Common Processing Pipeline For Copy-move Forgery Detementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ryu et al [9] divided the image into overlapping 24×24 blocks and calculated the Zernike moments for each block. They sorted the Zernike feature vectors lexicographically and computed the Euclidean distance between adjacent stored blocks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good forgery detection method should be robust to some types of transformations, such as scaling, rotations and JPEG compression and Gaussian Noise addition. Recently, an attempt was made in [12] to identify copy-move forgery using Zernike moments. Their method detects duplicated region rotated some angle before it is pasted.…”
Section: Fig 1 the Photo (Right) Is A Tampered With Original (Left)mentioning
confidence: 99%