1973
DOI: 10.1021/es60083a010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and estimation of isopropyl methylphosphonofluoridate and O-ethyl S-diisopropylaminoethylmethylphosphonothioate in sea water in parts-per-trillion level

Abstract: The milk portion of the diet had 0.16-0.46 mg Sr, with an average of 0.29 mg, or 32.1% (Rehnberg et al., 1969). In the present study, analyses of the diets of children showed intakes of 0.792-2.43 mg Sr, with an average of 1.237

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of OPs in environmental and biological samples is routinely conducted using various analytical techniques, including nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy [ 21 ], gas, liquid or thin layer chromatography, and mass spectrometry [ 20 ]. A variety of approaches have been investigated for sensors, including enzymatic assays [ 18 ], molecular imprinting coupled with luminescence (using lanthanides) [ 14 17 ], colorimetric methods [ 22 24 ], surface acoustic waves [ 25 , 26 ], fluorescent organic molecules [ 27 – 29 ], and interferometry [ 19 ]. The most common ways for detecting OP pesticides are chromatographic methods coupled with different detectors and different types of spectroscopy, immunoassays, and enzyme biosensors based on inhibition of cholinesterase activity [ 30 32 ].…”
Section: Advances In Detection Of Op Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of OPs in environmental and biological samples is routinely conducted using various analytical techniques, including nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy [ 21 ], gas, liquid or thin layer chromatography, and mass spectrometry [ 20 ]. A variety of approaches have been investigated for sensors, including enzymatic assays [ 18 ], molecular imprinting coupled with luminescence (using lanthanides) [ 14 17 ], colorimetric methods [ 22 24 ], surface acoustic waves [ 25 , 26 ], fluorescent organic molecules [ 27 – 29 ], and interferometry [ 19 ]. The most common ways for detecting OP pesticides are chromatographic methods coupled with different detectors and different types of spectroscopy, immunoassays, and enzyme biosensors based on inhibition of cholinesterase activity [ 30 32 ].…”
Section: Advances In Detection Of Op Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many innovations for the detection of this species including colorimetric detection methods [7,8] surface acoustic wave devices [9,10], enzymatic assays [11], interferometry [12] and fluorescent sensors [13][14][15]. However, all are plagued by at least one limitation or other such as slow response, lack of selectivity, poor sensitivity, operational complexities or non-portability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This detection, when integrated with decontamination, can be confidence boosting and user-friendly. Additionally there have been many other methods developed for the detection of these species, including colourimetry 24 , surface acoustic wave devices (SAW) [25][26] , enzymatic assays [27][28] , and interferometry [29][30] , however, presently these are not suitable for integration with the decontamination systems 31 . Besides this, nanosized particles of MgO, Al 2 O 3 and CaO are promising reactive sorbent materials that have been used as advanced decontaminant materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%