2021
DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-3010-2021-01-02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Det vitenskapelige essayet i profesjonsforskning: en kritiskutprøvende metode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the introduction to essay writing that was provided, the teacher could have been clearer about the rules that applied when writing an essay. Halås and McGuirk (2021) underlined that essays do not have a fixed structure but are a text that emerges as a process. It is about allowing experience to be exposed to critical reflection and theoretical considerations with new insights and understanding as a result (Heroa et al, 2023;Noroozi et al, 2023;Shields, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the introduction to essay writing that was provided, the teacher could have been clearer about the rules that applied when writing an essay. Halås and McGuirk (2021) underlined that essays do not have a fixed structure but are a text that emerges as a process. It is about allowing experience to be exposed to critical reflection and theoretical considerations with new insights and understanding as a result (Heroa et al, 2023;Noroozi et al, 2023;Shields, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selv om den essayistiske stilen er nokså fri i sin form, er det likevel et underliggende krav om sammenheng, konsistens, en viss systematikk og logisk fremstilling i et vitenskapelige essay (Halås & McGuirk, 2021). Derfor kan jeg ikke foreta en ensidig vandring i egen tankeverden, men ha en vitenskapelig bevegelse mellom det allmenne og subjektive gjennom en fortolkende kritisk refleksjon og en analyse av teorien.…”
Section: Hvorfor Essayistisk?unclassified
“…Since completing our Ph.D. studies, all three authors have been concerned about the consequences of governmental policy guidelines for practice, education, and research. Our concern can be understood as experiences of discrepancies (Lindseth, 2017), for example, an unexpected outcome, disappointed expectations, a feeling that something is wrong or poorly done, or even the unexpected joy of succeeding (Halås, 2017;Halås and Fuglseth, 2021). These are experiences that deviate from our preconceptions and expectations, and for the experienced professional these are a warning about a problem that requires attention and thought.…”
Section: Foucault's Perspectives On Systemic Guidance Through a Panop...mentioning
confidence: 99%