Designing an ICT self-management service: suggestions from persons with type 2 diabetes

Gardsten, Cecilia; Mörtberg, Christina; Blomqvist, Kerstin

doi:10.1007/s12553-016-0176-9

Cited by 11 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This may be because these stakeholders were not recruited but already part of the project team. The most common recruitment strategy was purposive or convenience sampling [30,31,33,37,42,46,52,63,70,71,80,83] followed by snowball or in-person recruitment [40,65,71,79]. One study used representative sampling to include all potential users [67].…”

Section: Stakeholder Recruitmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Others mentioned the use of an icebreaker [80]. Introductions were given and sometimes also refreshments [85].…”

Section: Stakeholder Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To stimulate intuitive representations [32], participants were given blank cards and were invited to write on them directly [98]. Some facilitators also took an active role in helping participants suggest creative ideas but without trying to be dominant [80]. Another measure that was taken at the end of a PD session was to invite participants to walk around and look at the creations of other teams (world cafés) to increase the diversity of perspectives [32,93].…”

Section: Stakeholder Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In all, 8 studies referred to specific techniques for a participatory prototyping approach such as thinking aloud [42,46,52,65,70,98], and 1 study referred to a card sorting technique for tell tools (Collaborative Analysis of Requirements and Design; CARD) [63]. Furthermore, methodological references were made to Design studio [65], Scaffold [41], the good enough model [71], and future workshops [80,91]. [36,52,59,76,79,81,93,96,102] 2D mapping, brainstorm, post-its [27,33,35,36,38,48,[52][53][54]59,71,75,76,81,86,96] Prototyping, 2D or 3D mockup, sketch [35,79,93] Persona [79,86] Cards [53,76] Storyboarding [35,54,81,…”

Section: Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Tools (n=69).Predesign[30,34,37,41,[44][45][46]49,61,66,77,80,[83][84][85]88,91,92,[97][98][99][100] 2D mapping, brainstorm, post-it, mind map, Chinese portrait[26] [30,31,34,37,40,[42][43][44]46,49,61,67,77,78,[89][90][91][92]98,100,101] Prototyping, 2D mockup, 2D design, sketch…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Generative Participatory Design Methodology to Develop Electronic Health Interventions: Systematic Literature Review

Vandekerckhove¹,

Mul²,

Bramer³

et al. 2020

J Med Internet Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Generative participatory design (PD) may help in developing electronic health (eHealth) interventions. PD is characterized by the involvement of all stakeholders in creative activities. This is different from the traditional user-centered design, where users are less involved. When looking at PD from a research through design perspective, it is important to summarize the reasons for choosing a certain form of generative PD to further develop its methodology. However, the scientific literature is currently unclear about which forms of PD are used to develop eHealth and which arguments are used to substantiate the decision to use a certain form of generative PD. Objective This study aimed to explore the reporting and substantiation of generative PD methodologies in empirical eHealth studies published in scientific journals to further develop PD methodology in the field of eHealth. Methods A systematic literature review following the Cochrane guidelines was conducted in several databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE Ovid, Web of Science, and CINAHL EBSCOhost). Data were extracted on the recruitment and management of stakeholders, the use of tools, and the use of outcome measures. Results Of the 3131 studies initially identified, 69 were selected for qualitative synthesis. The reporting was very variable, depending to a large extent on whether the study stated that reporting on the PD process was a major aim. The different levels of reporting and substantiation of the choices of a recruitment strategy, stakeholder management, and tools and outcome measures are presented. Only a few authors explicitly used arguments directly related to PD guiding principles such as democratic, mutual learning, tacit and latent knowledge, and collective creativity. Even though PD principles were not always explicitly discussed in the method descriptions of the studies, they were implicitly present, mostly in the descriptions of the use of PD tools. The arguments used to substantiate the choices made in stakeholder management, PD tools, and the type of outcome measures adopted point to the involvement of PD principles. Conclusions Studies that have used a PD research methodology to develop eHealth primarily substantiate the choice of tools made and much less the use of stakeholders and outcome measures.

show abstract

Section: Stakeholder Recruitmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Others mentioned the use of an icebreaker [80]. Introductions were given and sometimes also refreshments [85].…”

Section: Stakeholder Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Stakeholder Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Generative Participatory Design Methodology to Develop Electronic Health Interventions: Systematic Literature Review

Vandekerckhove¹,

Mul²,

Bramer³

et al. 2020

J Med Internet Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Using Gamified Solutions in Pediatric Diabetes Self-management: A Literature Review

Attef

Harris

2019

Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Citizen involvement in research on technological innovations for health, care or well-being: a scoping review

Leersum

Jaschinski

Bults

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Citizen science can be a powerful approach to foster the successful implementation of technological innovations in health, care or well-being. Involving experience experts as co-researchers or co-designers of technological innovations facilitates mutual learning, community building, and empowerment. By utilizing the expert knowledge of the intended users, innovations have a better chance to get adopted and solve complex health-related problems. As citizen science is still a relatively new practice for health and well-being, little is known about effective methods and guidelines for successful collaboration. This scoping review aims to provide insight in 1) the levels of citizen involvement in current research on technological innovations for health, care or well-being, 2) the best practices and used participatory methodologies, and 3) lesson’s learned by the researchers. The search was performed in SCOPUS in January 2021 and included peer-reviewed journal and conference papers published between 2016 and 2020. The final selection (N=83) was limited to empirical studies that had a clear focus on technological innovations for health, care or well-being and involved citizens at the level of collaboration or higher. Our results show a growing interest in citizens science as an inclusive research approach. Citizens are predominantly involved in the design phase of innovations and less in the preparation, data-analyses or reporting phase. Eight records had citizens in the lead in one of the research phases. Researcher use different terms to describe their methodological approach including participatory design, co-design, community based participatory research, co-creation, public and patient involvement, partcipatory action research, user-centered design and citizen science. Our selection of best practice cases shows that succesfull citizen science projects develope a structural and longtidutinal partnership with their collaborators, use a situated and adaptive research approach, and have researchers that are willing to give-up tradional power dynamics and engage in a mutual learning experience.

show abstract

Designing an ICT self-management service: suggestions from persons with type 2 diabetes

Cited by 11 publications

References 37 publications

Generative Participatory Design Methodology to Develop Electronic Health Interventions: Systematic Literature Review

Generative Participatory Design Methodology to Develop Electronic Health Interventions: Systematic Literature Review

Using Gamified Solutions in Pediatric Diabetes Self-management: A Literature Review

Citizen involvement in research on technological innovations for health, care or well-being: a scoping review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About