2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of porous titanium scaffold for complete mandibular reconstruction: The influence of pore architecture parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to the stress shielding effect, it was not conducive to the patient’s recovery. Because PEEK has similar mechanical strength to human bones, desirable results were observed in mandibular replacements [ 85 , 153 ].…”
Section: Polymer Materials Of 3d-printed Bone Scaffoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the stress shielding effect, it was not conducive to the patient’s recovery. Because PEEK has similar mechanical strength to human bones, desirable results were observed in mandibular replacements [ 85 , 153 ].…”
Section: Polymer Materials Of 3d-printed Bone Scaffoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All fixes limited the degrees of freedom of the corresponding nodes, and all muscle forces were applied equally to the corresponding nodes on the mandibular surface. The values and directions of the normal muscle forces were obtained from relevant research [28,29].…”
Section: Biomechanical Evaluation Of Porous Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that octahedron scaffolds exhibited superior static mechanical properties, longer fatigue lives, and higher fatigue strength in comparison to those of tetrahedron ones. It is noteworthy that the porous structure was often built using diamond lattice pore units [200][201][202]. In [126], the Ti-6Al-4V porous scaffolds of two unit cell geometries (reentrant and cubic) fabricated using EBM showed that samples with the cubic unit cell geometries, with struts oriented at an angle of 45 • to the loading direction, and exhibited higher stiffness than samples with the reentrant unit cell geometry at equivalent relative densities.…”
Section: Structural Factors Influencing the Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparatively, the scaffolds with lesser ID (0.3 mm) resulted in higher stiffness, thereby evoking lower principal strains in the CMC models. Moreover, considering the weight of the scaffolds, the CMC models having 0.3 mm ID with 0.2 mm SD and 0.5 mm ID with 0.6 mm SD is the most appropriate for a patient [201]. In [204], with a fixed strut diameter of 0.45 mm and a mean cell size of 2.2 mm, a tetrahedral structural porous scaffold was designed for a simulated anatomical defect derived from the CT data of a human mandible.…”
Section: Structural Factors Influencing the Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%