Design for Reliability: Human and Organisational Factors

Bea, Robert G.

doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-044381-2.50019-9

Cited by 8 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The potential for manipulation should be managed through disciplined qualification by those who perform assessments and external and internal processes used to validate the results from quantitative assessments. The situation of minimum structure projects around the year 2000 gave the opportunity to focus on uncertainties and the robustness of concepts (Bea, 2002(Bea, , 2005Shetty, 2000). Pitblado (2011) has considered global initiatives to reduce major hazard risk and finds that the hydrocarbon (HC) leak frequency on the UK Continental Shelf has not been reduced due to the implementation of safety cases.…”

Section: Previous Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Lindøe et al (2012) have not considered whether the Norwegian and UK regulations are robust to any real depth nor have the risk management challenges been discussed. Robustness in this context implies, as a minimum, the ability to tolerate damage and defects (Bea, 2005) but should also cover the ability to cater for unknown requirements that may arise at a later stage of the field life cycle.…”

Section: Previous Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Uncertainties in a risk management context in early phases of offshore petroleum field development

Vinnem

2014

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Previous Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Previous Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Uncertainties in a risk management context in early phases of offshore petroleum field development

Vinnem

2014

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…(Cartlidge, 2020) 2.5. Constructability: Technical Feasibility Bea (2005) defines that a design made considering constructability should enable construction, taking into consideration, employee qualifications, capabilities, safety, environmental impacts, and interfaces between the equipment and workers. Further it consists of operational performance evaluation, value engineering, knowledge management, cost/benefit analysis, quality management and building performance framework, i.e., spatial performance, acoustic performance, visual performance, indoor atmosphere, thermal performance, and building integrity analysis.…”

Section: Project Feasibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Codesign as a Cocreation Strategy on Constructability (Among Sri Lankan Architectural and Engineering Design Start-Up Practices)

Kiralawelle Muhandiramge

2023

Sri Lanka J. Marketing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research looks at the influence that codesign has on the constructability of a project and how the client’s knowledge impacts this relationship. Client knowledge is explored as a mediator. Further The factor that gave the largest contribution to codesign was the form of facilitation with a mean of 1.59, which was closest to the strongly agree point on the scale (number 1 was assigned to Strongly agree). The overall mean value of codesign was 1.82. Knowledge management gave the largest contribution towards constructability with a mean of 1.61. The overall mean of constructability was 1.70. The mediator, client knowledge had an overall mean of 2.10 with experience having the largest contribution with a mean of 2.08. Four hypotheses were tested. Hypothesis 1 was accepted since the correlation was 0.633, and its significance was 0.000, with the regression model fitting by 40.1%, showing that there was an impact on constructability from codesign. Hypothesis 2 was to test whether codesign and client knowledge were related, and it was proven, since correlation is reported to be 0.432 and its significance is 0.000, with the regression model fitting by 18.6%. Hypothesis 3 tested the relationship between client knowledge and constructability. It was also accepted in the correlation is reported to be 0.453 and its significance is 0.000 with the regression model fitting by 20.6%. Further, all factors in the three variables were validated through cross validation via thematic analysis, except for access to information. This could be because the client may not be able to interpret the information on their own. Hypothesis 4 investigated the mediator and an z value of 2.26 with significance of 0.000 indicates that client knowledge significantly mediates the relationship between codesign and constructability.

show abstract

“…In addition, QA/QC should be implemented in all stages of design, fabrication, and operation. Such structural integrity features have been documented in aeronautical engineering [30,31], in civil engineering [40,41] and for offshore structures [6,10,18,42]. In connection with ongoing work with Eurocodes [43], hazards are categorized as identifiable or unidentifiable, referring to explosions and fires and "consequences of human errors," respectively.…”

Section: Structural Integrity Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrity Management of Offshore Structures With Emphasis on Design for Structural Damage Tolerance

Moan

2020

Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on relevant accident experiences with oil and gas platforms, structural integrity management of offshore structures is briefly outlined, including adequate design criteria, fabrication and operational procedures, as well as life cycle quality assurance and control. The focus is on developing an operational design standard for accidental collapse limit states to ensure robustness or damage tolerance. The focus is to ensure an acceptable safety level against progressive failure leading to total loss in view of initial damage caused by accidental actions due to operational errors and abnormal structural damage due to fabrication errors and abnormal deterioration during operation as well as the actions on the damaged structure and inherent uncertainties. Moreover, the damage tolerance required for achieving safety by inspection, monitoring and repair strategies, is briefly addressed. While the basic damage tolerance requirement refers to the survival of the structure in certain damage conditions, wider aspects of robustness in terms of the structure’s sensitivity to the deviation of action effects and resistances from normal conditions are also briefly addressed. In particular, it is suggested to provide robustness in cases where the structural performance is sensitive to uncertain parameters, by choosing conservative values of these parameters.

show abstract

Design for Reliability: Human and Organisational Factors

Cited by 8 publications

References 10 publications

Uncertainties in a risk management context in early phases of offshore petroleum field development

Uncertainties in a risk management context in early phases of offshore petroleum field development

Influence of Codesign as a Cocreation Strategy on Constructability (Among Sri Lankan Architectural and Engineering Design Start-Up Practices)

Integrity Management of Offshore Structures With Emphasis on Design for Structural Damage Tolerance

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About