2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2012.6289123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and implementation of a fully integrated compressed-sensing signal acquisition system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our D.C. coupled system is complementary to the radio frequency architectures recently reported in [17,18]. We expect that further optimization of the circuit components combined with fabrication in a state-of-the-art process will allow our system to span both ranges of operating frequencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our D.C. coupled system is complementary to the radio frequency architectures recently reported in [17,18]. We expect that further optimization of the circuit components combined with fabrication in a state-of-the-art process will allow our system to span both ranges of operating frequencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…From a hardware perspective, compressive sampling is desirable because the modulation of the input signal with a binary sequence is simpler and easier to implement at high sampling rates as compared with the sample and hold circuits necessary for interleaved architectures. A single chip sub-Nyquist sampling receiver architecture operating between 100 MHz and 2 GHz was recently reported in the literature [17,18].…”
Section: Analog To Information Convertermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…i.e. This algorithm takes the advantages of sub-Nyquist method and using multichannel to sample the input signal at low rate, based on the RD concept [6].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlabeled sensing is similar to compressed sensing in the sense that they both deal with partially revealed information in a linear measurement system. Compressed sensing [7,8] states that if we have some prior knowledge about the sparsity of the input x, we might be able to reconstruct it uniquely when N < K. The sparsity assumption enables us to model real life applications using compressed sensing [9,10]. On the other hand, in unlabeled sensing there is no specific assumption on the sparsity of data x and the missing part of the information is the correct order of sample values in y.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%