2005 2nd International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems
DOI: 10.1109/iswcs.2005.1547773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Hardware Implementation of a Novel Smart Antenna Algorithm Using TI DSPs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our proposed SCC algorithm can be considered as the practical version of Vector RAKE receiver. Unlike nonblind type LMS [5] and blind type CM [5,30] algorithms, SCC algorithm does not require any training sequence or learning parameter and its weight vector computation time is not affected by the array topology and multipath fading conditions [31].…”
Section: Contribution Of This Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our proposed SCC algorithm can be considered as the practical version of Vector RAKE receiver. Unlike nonblind type LMS [5] and blind type CM [5,30] algorithms, SCC algorithm does not require any training sequence or learning parameter and its weight vector computation time is not affected by the array topology and multipath fading conditions [31].…”
Section: Contribution Of This Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean and standard deviation derived from these cumulative distributions are given in Table 5. For the comparison, we also provide results of our previous study [30] obtained for non-blind type LMS and blind-type CM beamformers. Although CM beamformer's SINR performance is slightly better than LMS and SCC, all three beamformers provide nearly the same SINR values.…”
Section: Signal-to-interference Plus Noise Ratio (Sinr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We implement Least Mean Squares (LMS), Constant Modulus (CM), and our previously proposed practical Space Code Correlator (SCC) [14][15][16] based beamformers for CDMA2000. We evaluate their performance in terms of beamforming accuracy, FPGA resource utilization and convergence time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because, when implemented on programmable processors, these algorithms will facilitate upgrade of existing 3G base stations into smart antenna capable base stations. For this purpose, this paper has focused on implementation of CDMA-FDD adaptable antenna array algorithms which are least mean square (LMS) [6] and space code correlator (SCC) algorithms [7] on an FPGA (such as Virtex II Pro FG456 Proto Board) instead of on DSP and compared floating point DSPs implementations (such as Texas Instruments' C6701 EVM, C6711 DSK, and C6713 DSK [8]). DSP implementations are optimized and updated according to previous study [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%