2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2957046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Analysis of a 4-kW Two-Stack Coreless Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine for Low-Speed Applications

Abstract: This paper presents a comparative performance analysis of 4-kW axial flux permanent magnet synchronous machines (AFPMSMs) with and without a rotor core. The present study is intended for lowspeed applications; however, the investigated machines are designed using an improved diameter-to-length method and their comparative performance is assessed using comprehensive electromagnetic finite element analysis. The results of this analysis suggest that the proposed coreless topology has the advantages of higher outp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, in Fig. 4(a) the current control is done using hysteresis control for which current references The three-phase input armature current containing fundamental-harmonic and third-harmonic current components can be formulated as (1), where I1 is the magnitude of the fundamental-harmonic of the phase currents and I3 is the magnitude of the third-harmonic current component.…”
Section: Proposed Inverter Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, in Fig. 4(a) the current control is done using hysteresis control for which current references The three-phase input armature current containing fundamental-harmonic and third-harmonic current components can be formulated as (1), where I1 is the magnitude of the fundamental-harmonic of the phase currents and I3 is the magnitude of the third-harmonic current component.…”
Section: Proposed Inverter Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Permanent magnet (PM) machines offer numerous advantages over wound field synchronous machines (WFSMs). One such advantage is their higher efficiency due to the lack of rotor field winding and reduced copper losses [1]- [3]. Furthermore, their torque density, power density, and power factor are higher than those of WFSMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I NDUCTION machines are widely used in industrial applications, such as conveyor belts and electric motors, because they are relatively robust, cost-effective, and simple in design. With the progressive development of electric vehicles and renewable wind energy utilizationnowadays, induction motor (IM) control design is increasingly important in both research and industry, as the complex, nonlinear models of these motors make precise control difficult [1], [2]. Direct torque control (DTC) schemes, also known as bang-band controllers, were initially proposed for the IM by Takahashi and Noguchi in 1986 [3], and by Depenbrock in 1988 [4], and are used extensively for high-performance AC drives for their simple decoupled topology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct torque control (DTC) schemes, also known as bang-band controllers, were initially proposed for the IM by Takahashi and Noguchi in 1986 [3], and by Depenbrock in 1988 [4], and are used extensively for high-performance AC drives for their simple decoupled topology. Two cascaded loops are used in these systems: (1) an inner loop, which generates a reference stator flux and torque, and (2) an outer loop, which is implemented through lookup-table-based hysteresis control using the references generated by the inner loop. The DTC is one of the most robust control technique owing to its insensitivity to control parameters [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PM MC analysis is significantly more complicated than solenoid MC's owing to the mutual interaction between the PM and coil magnetic fields. Computationally expensive 3D finite element analysis (FEA) is commonly employed for electromagnetic analysis and design [14]. PM MC FEA leads to extremely long analysis times, especially when numerous designs must be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%