Desenvolvimento do feijoeiro sob o uso de biofertilizante e adubação mineral

Galbiatti, João Antônio; Silva, Flávia G. da; Franco, Claudenir Facincani; Caramelo, Anaira Denise

doi:10.1590/s0100-69162011000100017

Cited by 27 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 8 publications

(7 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Similar positive effects of bio-fertilizers on yield and growth of pearl millet as well as various field crops, compared to mineral fertilizers, has been well documented (e.g. Galbiatti et al, 2011;Bana et al, 2012;Abdullahi et al, 2014;Patel et al, 2014) . In her investigation to the effect of mineral, organic, and bio-fertilizers on yield and agronomic characteristics of pearl millet Shandaweel 1 cultivar, Hend (2017) reported that the application of nitrobine bio-fertilizer in combination with 60 kg N fed -1 gave similar results to the application of 120 kg N fed -1 alone, for the yield and the studied agronomic characteristics.…”

Section: Cultivar X Fertilizer Interactionsupporting

confidence: 55%

Effect of the Integrated Use of Mineral- and Bio-Fertilizers on Yield and Some Agronomic Characteristics of Fodder Pearl Millet (Pennisetum Glaucum L.)

Habiba

Salama

Bondok

2018

Alexandria Science Exchange Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Cultivar X Fertilizer Interactionsupporting

confidence: 55%

Effect of the Integrated Use of Mineral- and Bio-Fertilizers on Yield and Some Agronomic Characteristics of Fodder Pearl Millet (Pennisetum Glaucum L.)

Habiba

Salama

Bondok

2018

Alexandria Science Exchange Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Meanwhile, both Luqueño et al (2010) and Galbiatti et al (2011) reported that, application of organic fertilizers resulted in higher productivity by common beans than did mineral fertilizers. Additionally, increases in common bean productivity when manure is used for fertilizer have been reported by several authors (PAULETTI et al, 2008;CAVALCANTE et al, 2009;MELO et al, 2009;PEREIRA et al, 2013;PEREIRA et al, 2015).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Resultados semelhantes foram obtidos por Luqueño et al (2010) e Galbiatti et al (2011), nos quais foi possível observar efeito positivo da adubação orgânica em comparação aos fertilizantes minerais no feijoeiro. Outros estudos têm evidenciado aumentos na produtividade do feijão comum com o uso de estercos na adubação, sendo relatados por vários autores (PAULETTI et al, 2008;CAVALCANTE et al, 2009;MELO et al, 2009;PEREIRA et al, 2013;PEREIRA et al, 2015).…”

Section: Resultsunclassified

Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategies

Toledo

Agápto

Almeida

2017

AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The feasibility of reducing non-renewable natural resources use in agriculture, associated with the need for ecologically-appropriate of organic waste disposal has become an important element in planning more sustainable agricultural systems. Consequently, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the response of the common bean, growing in an Eutrophic Latosol in the city of Buri-SP, to the application of organic and mineral fertilizers. An experiment was carried out in the 2015 agricultural year, using a randomized block design with 4 replicates and 5 treatments, these being: 1 -mineral fertilizer; 2 -organomineral fertilizer; 3 -sheep manure compost; 4 -chicken bedding compost, and control (soil without fertilizer application). The tested variables were: pod length (cm); per plant pod number; per pod seed number; mass of 100 grains (g); and grain yield (kg ha -1 ). Organomineral fertilizer provided the most significant increase in pod length, per plant pod number, and yield compared to the other treatments, except for sheep manure compost, where productivity did not differ. In addition, with the exception of mass per 100 seeds, there was no difference between treatments using organic fertilization and mineral fertilizer. Under the current study´s experimental conditions, organomineral fertilizer and sheep manure compost produced the highest productivity for common beans. Thus, mineral fertilization can be replaced by organic or organomineral alternatives, so helping to produce more sustainable production management and help reduce environmental impacts.

show abstract

“…Galbiatti et al [36], studying the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris (L.)) under biofertiliser and mineral fertiliser, found that there was a statistical difference between the mean values under study for productivity only.…”

Section: Source Of Variationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Production Indicators in Cowpea as a Function of the Water–Fertiliser Nexus

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The bean is an important crop in feeding the global population. In the northeast of Brazil, it is of particular importance, since it is a staple food, which also generates employment and income. The low productivity of the northeast in recent years due to the water crisis combined with the cost of energy has compromised technical and economic viability. This study aimed to evaluate production parameters of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) under different alternative production systems in the northeast of Brazil. The study was carried out in the experimental area of the sewage treatment plant (STP) in the district of Tianguá, Ceará. The experiment comprised six production systems (treatments) divided into split plots distributed in a completely randomised design with fifteen replications. The systems irrigated with wastewater and amended with different of fertilisers were no fertiliser (S2A0), mineral fertiliser (S2A1) and organic fertiliser (S2A2), as well as systems irrigated with drinking (S1A0, S1A1 and S1A2). It was found that under the systems irrigated with wastewater, the average productivity was 1468.8 kg ha−1, whereas under the systems irrigated with drinking water, it was 984.1 kg ha−1. The production systems that used wastewater (S2A0, S2A1 and S2A2) resulted in greater productivity compared to the production models irrigated with drinking water with organic fertiliser (S1A2) and with no fertiliser (S1A0). All the production models irrigated with wastewater yielded similar results to the conventional system with mineral fertiliser, showing that treated wastewater contains sufficient nutrients to potentially replace mineral fertilisers in cowpea production in the northeast of Brazil. The use of treated domestic effluent increases the productivity of irrigated crops.

show abstract

Desenvolvimento do feijoeiro sob o uso de biofertilizante e adubação mineral

Cited by 27 publications

References 8 publications

Effect of the Integrated Use of Mineral- and Bio-Fertilizers on Yield and Some Agronomic Characteristics of Fodder Pearl Millet (Pennisetum Glaucum L.)

Effect of the Integrated Use of Mineral- and Bio-Fertilizers on Yield and Some Agronomic Characteristics of Fodder Pearl Millet (Pennisetum Glaucum L.)

Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategies

Production Indicators in Cowpea as a Function of the Water–Fertiliser Nexus

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About