The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research 2019
DOI: 10.1017/9781108654555.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Descriptive Statistics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1,531 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, blank submissions and obvious false information, such as 1-or 5-star ratings on all items (controlled by negatively formulated statements), have been removed from the dataset. Data analyses were performed with descriptive statistics (means, effect-sizes), and with t-test, and two-way ANOVA to assess the extent to which the intervention had an impact on students under the consideration of gender and environmental conditions [38], [39].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, blank submissions and obvious false information, such as 1-or 5-star ratings on all items (controlled by negatively formulated statements), have been removed from the dataset. Data analyses were performed with descriptive statistics (means, effect-sizes), and with t-test, and two-way ANOVA to assess the extent to which the intervention had an impact on students under the consideration of gender and environmental conditions [38], [39].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used descriptive statistics to analyze data related to the above criteria and sought to spell out implications and recommendations. We applied two types of descriptive statistics: frequency distribution (numbers or percentages) and measures of central tendency, such as the mean [45].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the linear regression analysis, we calculated the test statistic, t, as 3.254 with a corresponding p-value of 0.00576, which indicates statistical significance based on our 95% confidence threshold and corresponding 0.05 alpha value. The calculated effect size, Pearson's correlation coefficient, r, was 0.656, which indicates a strong correlation according to Haden's threshold of 0.6 (Haden, 2019). A graphical representation of the linear regression is presented below in Figure 3.…”
Section: Rq1a: Are Peer-reviewed Research Publications Effective Diss...mentioning
confidence: 93%