2018
DOI: 10.4256/ijmtl.v19i2.53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Describing Lesson Study Designed for Improvement of Mathematics Teachers' Knowledge of Student Thinking

Aytuğ ÖZALTUN ÇELİK,
Esra BUKOVA GÜZEL

Abstract: The aim of this study is to explain the process of lesson study designed for improving the mathematics teachers' knowledge of student thinking and to examine its effectiveness in terms of the teaching process and the teachers' professional development. The lesson study composed of three cycles was carried out with three mathematics teachers. Each cycle comprised of five stages. The data were collected from the interviews, the lesson observations, the field notes and the reflective diaries. The interviews were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, all 18 articles approached the step of documentation differently. Approaches included, among others, reflective diaries or journals kept by teachers (Özaltun Çelik and Bukova Güzel, 2018;Calleja and Formosa, 2020), a specific template for note taking (Lee and Tan, 2020), meeting calendars (Kanellopoulou and Darra, 2018a), a report prepared by either the whole LS group (Özdemir, 2019) or a designated group member (Chua, 2019), as well as teachers' individual documentation of the process in an online space . This variety of ways in which LS groups document and mobilize their learning demonstrates that the research community cannot and should not presume that there is a standard process of documenting teachers' learnings in LS that requires no further communication in research articles.…”
Section: Omission Of Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, all 18 articles approached the step of documentation differently. Approaches included, among others, reflective diaries or journals kept by teachers (Özaltun Çelik and Bukova Güzel, 2018;Calleja and Formosa, 2020), a specific template for note taking (Lee and Tan, 2020), meeting calendars (Kanellopoulou and Darra, 2018a), a report prepared by either the whole LS group (Özdemir, 2019) or a designated group member (Chua, 2019), as well as teachers' individual documentation of the process in an online space . This variety of ways in which LS groups document and mobilize their learning demonstrates that the research community cannot and should not presume that there is a standard process of documenting teachers' learnings in LS that requires no further communication in research articles.…”
Section: Omission Of Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%