Der Rückgang der Langzeitarbeitslosigkeit in Deutschland: Ein Erfolg der Hartz-Reformen oder konjunktureller Effekt?

Klinger, Sabine; Rothe, Thomás

doi:10.3790/schm.132.1.89

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…1 Die Mehrheit der deutschen Wirtschaftsforschungsinstitute geht derzeit noch davon aus, dass die deutsche Wirtschaft schon im Jahresendquartal 2019 wieder leicht wächst und ab Anfang 2020 Wachstumsraten nahe denen des Potenzialoutputs erreicht, ohne dass es im Verlauf des Abschwungs zu einer spürbaren Unterauslastung der Produktion kommen würde. 2…”

Section: Ein Langfristiges Investitionspaket Zur Kurzfristigen Stabilunclassified

Economic Policy in Crisis

Dullien¹,

Kooths

Clemens

et al. 2019

Wirtschaftsdienst

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Ein Langfristiges Investitionspaket Zur Kurzfristigen Stabilunclassified

Economic Policy in Crisis

Dullien¹,

Kooths

Clemens

et al. 2019

Wirtschaftsdienst

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…At the same time search incentives were increased by shorter durations of unemployment benefit payouts and by an intensified use of sanctions. (c) Finally, labor market regulations were relaxed, e.g., with respect to employment protection, temporary employment, and temporary agency employment (Klinger andRothe 2012, Caliendo andHogenacker 2012). It was generally expected that all of these pathways contribute to reduce transfer dependence and to shorten periods of transfer receipt.…”

Section: Institutionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…employment status, into employed non-recipients and non-employed non-recipients. In this way, the three-state categorization allows us to differentiate alternative pathways in and out of welfare benefit receipt, as 2 Fahr and Sunde (2009) and Klinger and Rothe (2012) find that the early Hartz Reforms significantly improved the efficiency of labor market matching, benefiting particularly the long term unemployed. Several studies evaluated the effects of elements of the reform packages (e.g., Huber et al 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

State dependence in welfare receipt: transitions before and after a reform

Riphahn

Wunder

2015

Empir Econ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research at DIW BerlinThis series presents research findings based either directly on data from the German SocioEconomic Panel study (SOEP) or using SOEP data as part of an internationally comparable data set (e.g. CNEF, ECHP, LIS, LWS, CHER/PACO). SOEP is a truly multidisciplinary household panel study covering a wide range of social and behavioral sciences: economics, sociology, psychology, survey methodology, econometrics and applied statistics, educational science, political science, public health, behavioral genetics, demography, geography, and sport science.The decision to publish a submission in SOEPpapers is made by a board of editors chosen by the DIW Berlin to represent the wide range of disciplines covered by SOEP. There is no external referee process and papers are either accepted or rejected without revision. Papers appear in this series as works in progress and may also appear elsewhere. They often represent preliminary studies and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be requested from the author directly.Any opinions expressed in this series are those of the author(s) and not those of DIW Berlin.Research disseminated by DIW Berlin may include views on public policy issues, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. State dependence in welfare receipt: transitions before and after a reform AbstractWe study state dependence in welfare receipt and investigate whether welfare transitions changed after a welfare reform. Using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel, we apply dynamic multinomial logit estimators and find that state dependence in welfare receipt is not a central feature of the German welfare system. We find that welfare transitions changed after the reform:transitions from welfare to employment became more likely and persistence in welfare and inactivity declined. We observe a large relative increase in transitions from employment to welfare.Immigrants' responsiveness to the labor market situation increased after the reform.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%