2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-017-3543-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependence of Arctic climate on the latitudinal position of stationary waves and to high-latitudes surface warming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A strengthening of the subtropical jet reinforces vertical wind shears, and the enhanced baroclinicity attracts the eddy‐driven jet equatorward (Figures 2b, 2c, 2g and 2h). A stronger SH subtropical jet is associated with an equatorward eddy‐driven jet location, defined as the latitude of the maximum zonal‐mean zonal wind at 850 hPa (Figure S5b in Supporting Information ), consistent with previous studies (e.g., Brayshaw et al., 2008; Shin et al., 2017). That is, the eddy‐driven jet location is dependent on the subtropical jet strength, which in turn depends on the Hadley cell strength.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A strengthening of the subtropical jet reinforces vertical wind shears, and the enhanced baroclinicity attracts the eddy‐driven jet equatorward (Figures 2b, 2c, 2g and 2h). A stronger SH subtropical jet is associated with an equatorward eddy‐driven jet location, defined as the latitude of the maximum zonal‐mean zonal wind at 850 hPa (Figure S5b in Supporting Information ), consistent with previous studies (e.g., Brayshaw et al., 2008; Shin et al., 2017). That is, the eddy‐driven jet location is dependent on the subtropical jet strength, which in turn depends on the Hadley cell strength.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The periodic Qflux itself neither adds nor subtracts energy from the global system over one forcing cycle, but the global‐mean surface temperature slightly decreases by 0.4 K during the initial 30‐year adjustment period (Shin et al., 2021). This drift occurs because the surface temperature is more sensitive to an imposed cooling than to an imposed warming associated with nonlinear cloud radiative effect (CRE) (e.g., Shaw et al., 2015; Shin et al., 2017). Hence, the first 30‐year is regarded as a spin‐up period.…”
Section: Model and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, nonlinear cloud-radiative feedbacks can cause a significant shift in the zonal-mean ITCZ. 41,42 Furthermore, a given inter-hemispheric forcing can cause an ITCZ shift that varies in magnitude by more than 100% when a convection scheme parameter is tuned in a model in a way that alters the strength of cloud radiative effect. 13,43 Model spread in cloud response is a dominant source for model spread in the ITCZ shift in response to inter-hemispheric forcing.…”
Section: Limitations and Ways Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the turbulent fluxes require larger SST changes under a colder and drier mean state to balance the prescribed surface heating. 22,42 The contrast may be enhanced in comprehensive models since nonlinear cloud radiative effect changes amplify the forcing in the cooling region. 41 The strengthened (weakened) eddy fluxes in the SH (NH) extract more (less) energy out of the tropics.…”
Section: ∂Ts ∂φmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, localized heat removal (Figure 1b) produces stronger SST anomalies than localized heat input (Figure 1a), and dominates the response when both forcings are present (Figure 1f). This asymmetry arises due to nonlinear feedbacks in the surface energy budget (Shaw et al, 2015;Shin et al, 2017) and becomes apparent when the Q-flux perturbations are larger (compare Figures 1a,1b and 1c,1d). This asymmetry will be useful for understanding the Arctic moisture transport responses discussed later.…”
Section: Model Experiments and Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 95%