1989
DOI: 10.1109/26.46511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependence in packet queues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…-autocorrelations in packet interarrival times -autocorrelations in packet service times -crosscorrelations among packet interarrival times and packet service times -crosscorrelations in packet service times for tandem queues Generally, successive packet interarrival times are often positively correlated [11]. This is valid for successive packet service times as well.…”
Section: Queueing Delay In Chained Ip Routersmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…-autocorrelations in packet interarrival times -autocorrelations in packet service times -crosscorrelations among packet interarrival times and packet service times -crosscorrelations in packet service times for tandem queues Generally, successive packet interarrival times are often positively correlated [11]. This is valid for successive packet service times as well.…”
Section: Queueing Delay In Chained Ip Routersmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…On the other hand, under heavy loads, the average delay tends to be dramatically less. A reverse situation is valid under light traffic conditions as well [11].…”
Section: Queueing Delay In Chained Ip Routersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, using SCV as a single measure of the variability of a non-renewal process may result in significant error in the approximation of performance measure. It is shown that the two-moment parametrization that does not account for the autocorrelation is subject to a serious under-approximation of waiting time especially at a bottleneck station in a network with highly variable arrival process or highly variable service process; Fendick, Saksena, and Whitt(1989Whitt( , 1991, Jageman et. al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%