2020
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000020988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dental caries experience and related risk indicators of 12-year-old students in Jilin, China

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Risk factors in our study were mainly associated with socio-demographic information and dental experiences. In accordance with previous studies [ 27 , 28 ], “female children” have a higher risk factor for caries of permanent teeth. Their caries prevalence is associated with earlier tooth eruption [ 29 ], low salivary flow rate, sugar consumption [ 30 ] and dental phobia [ 31 , 32 ], which may require improvements in dental education, medical environmental design, and doctor-patient communication.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Risk factors in our study were mainly associated with socio-demographic information and dental experiences. In accordance with previous studies [ 27 , 28 ], “female children” have a higher risk factor for caries of permanent teeth. Their caries prevalence is associated with earlier tooth eruption [ 29 ], low salivary flow rate, sugar consumption [ 30 ] and dental phobia [ 31 , 32 ], which may require improvements in dental education, medical environmental design, and doctor-patient communication.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The subjective impression of oral health seems to have good predictive power [ 38 ]. A previous study showed significant differences in the “self-assessment of teeth” [ 28 ] among 12-year-old students. In the present study, “very poor oral health for self-assessment” was the most strongly weighted variable that contributed to the risk of severe caries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the age of 12 years was selected as the indicator age for global comparison. Several articles have described the dental caries status of 12-year-old children based on data from a single national survey [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. A DMFT index of less than 1.2 is judged to be very low, 1.2–2.6 is low, 2.7–4.4 is moderate, and 4.5 or more is high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%