Purpose
Describe the prevalence of visual impairment/blindness among older adults in rural populations in China.
Design
Population-based, cross-sectional study.
Participants
We evaluated 45 747 adults ≥ 50 years of age.
Methods
Geographically defined cluster sampling was used in randomly selecting a cross-section of residents from a representative rural county within each of 9 provinces in mainland China. Participants were enumerated through village registers followed by door-to-door household visits. Eligible persons were invited to local examination sites for visual acuity (VA) testing and eye examination.
Main Outcome Measures
Presenting and best-corrected distance VA.
Results
Of 50 395 enumerated eligible persons, 45 747 (90.8%) were examined and tested for VA. The prevalence of presenting visual impairment <20/63 to ≥20/400 in the better eye was 10.8% and blindness (<20/400) was 2.29%. Across the 9 provinces, presenting visual impairment ranged from 6.89% to 15.8%, and blindness from 1.27% to 5.40%. With best-corrected VA, the prevalence of visual impairment was 5.30%, and 1.93% for blindness. The ranges across the 9 provinces were 3.13% to 9.51% for visual impairment and 0.74% to 4.95% for blindness. Visual impairment and blindness were associated with older age, female gender, lack of education, and geographic area (province) with both presenting and best-corrected VA.
Conclusions
Visual impairment and blindness are important public health problems in rural China, with significant regional variations in prevalence. Blindness prevention programs targeting the rural elderly should be expanded, particularly in areas with limited access and affordability of eye care services. Special emphasis should be given to reaching women and those without education. Greater attention should also be given to correction of refractive error.
PURPOSE:
To estimate the prevalence of vision impairment and blindness in 2014 among older adults in rural China with
comparisons with the 2006 Nine-Province Survey.
DESIGN:
Population-based, cross-sectional study.
METHODS:
Geographical cluster sampling was used in randomly selecting residents from a rural county or semi-rural district
within 9 provinces: Beijing, Jiangsu, Guangdong, Heilongjiang, Jiangxi, Hebei, Ningxia, Chongqing, and Yunnan. Persons 50
years of age or older were enumerated through household visits and invited to examination sites for visual acuity testing and
examination. Vision impairment and blindness in 2014 was compared with data from the 2006 survey.
RESULTS:
Among 51 310 examined persons, the prevalence of presenting vision impairment (<20/63 to ≥20/400) in the
better-seeing eye ranged from 6.05% to 15.3% across the 9 study sites, with presenting blindness (<20/400) ranging from
0.66% to 5.35%. With best-corrected visual acuity, the prevalence of vision impairment ranged from 1.96% to 8.74%, and
blindness from 0.47% to 5.01%. Vision impairment was associated with older age, female sex, and little or no education. The
overall prevalence of presenting vision impairment and blindness decreased during the 2006–2014 interval by 6.31% and
29.0%, respectively; and by 16.1% and 38.0%, respectively, after standardization of 2006 prevalence rates to the 2014
population.
CONCLUSIONS:
Substantial progress has been made in the reduction of vision impairment in rural China. Nevertheless, vision
impairment remains an important public health problem with substantial geographic disparities and with older age, female sex,
and illiteracy as risk factors.
Lack of knowledge about cataract and concerns about the quality of local services appear to be the principal barriers to cataract surgery in rural China.
Purpose:
To investigate the prevalence and visual acuity (VA) outcomes of cataract surgery in rural populations throughout China.
Design:
Population-based, cross-sectional study.
Participants:
Forty-five thousand seven hundred forty-seven adults 50 years of age and older.
Methods:
Geographically defined cluster sampling was used in randomly selecting a cross-section of residents from a representative rural county within each of 9 provinces in mainland China. Participants underwent VA measurements, refraction, and a slit-lamp examination at local examination sites; those with previous cataract surgery were queried as to the year and type of surgical facility. Surgical procedure and evidence of surgery complications were noted during the examination. The principal cause of visual impairment was identified for eyes with VA of 20/40 or worse.
Main Outcome Measures:
Cataract surgery procedure, presenting and best-corrected distance VA, and causes of visual impairment.
Results:
Of 50 395 enumerated eligible persons, 45 747 (90.8%) were examined and tested for VA. The overall prevalence of cataract surgery was 2.09%. Surgical coverage among those with VA worse than 20/200 in both eyes because of cataract was 35.7%. Unoperated cataract was associated with older age, female gender, lack of education, and geographic area (province). Among the 1174 cataract-operated eyes, 31.1% had presenting VA of 20/32 or better, 15.4% had presenting VA of 20/40 to 20/63, 30.0% had presenting VA worse than 20/63 to 20/200, and 23.5% had presenting VA worse than 20/200. With best correction, the percentages were 57.6%, 6.2%, 18.5%, and 17.7%, respectively. Posterior capsule opacification, refractive error, and retinal disorders were the main causes in cataract-operated eyes with VA worse than 20/63.
Conclusions:
Two thirds of those with bilateral visual impairment or blindness because of cataract remain in need of sight-restoring surgery. Posterior capsule opacification and refractive error, both readily amenable to treatment, were common in cataract-operated eyes. Sustained government efforts to provide access to affordable modern cataract surgery with a greater emphasis on postoperative follow-up and the quality of VA outcomes are needed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.