1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1991.tb00119.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dental caries and mutans streptococci in selected groups of urban and native Indian schoolchildren in Mexico

Abstract: Two groups of Mexican children aged 12-14 yr were examined for dental caries and salivary mutans streptococci counts. One hundred lived in Mexico City and 100 belonged to a native Mazahua Indian population. The prevalence of caries, diagnosed according to WHO, was 90% in Mexico City and 82% in the Indian community. Mean DMFT was 5.98 and 3.57 respectively. Saliva samples were analyzed for mutans streptococci by the "Strip mutans" method. Further identification of the biotype/serotype was done. Mutans streptoco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all subjects, S. mutans and S. sobrinus were present in 38.3% and 68.0%, respectively, whereas 14.8% were positive for S. mutans alone, 44.5% for S. sobrinus alone, and 23.5% for both S. mutans and S. sobrinus, with 17.2% negative for both S. mutans and S. sobrinus. These results indicate that the prevalence of mutans streptococci in 11-and 12-year-old Japanese schoolchildren is 85.9% and 78.9%, respectively, which is in agreement with similar surveys conducted in other parts of the world 18,[26][27][28] . The prevalence of S. sobrinus alone in this study was, however, higher than that in those studies, which used cultural methods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In all subjects, S. mutans and S. sobrinus were present in 38.3% and 68.0%, respectively, whereas 14.8% were positive for S. mutans alone, 44.5% for S. sobrinus alone, and 23.5% for both S. mutans and S. sobrinus, with 17.2% negative for both S. mutans and S. sobrinus. These results indicate that the prevalence of mutans streptococci in 11-and 12-year-old Japanese schoolchildren is 85.9% and 78.9%, respectively, which is in agreement with similar surveys conducted in other parts of the world 18,[26][27][28] . The prevalence of S. sobrinus alone in this study was, however, higher than that in those studies, which used cultural methods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…[345678181920] Our results also showed a statistically significant relation between different levels of S. mutans and lactobacilli and caries experience [Tables 3 and 4]. The study conducted by Campus et al .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…[34] A variety of potential predictors have been examined for an association with caries increments in longitudinal and cross-sectional studies, including initial or baseline caries prevalence scores for permanent and primary teeth, characteristics of occlusal morphology, levels of Streptococcus mutans and lactobacilli, salivary buffering capacity, dietary factors, sex, race, and socioeconomic status. [3456789101112]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another reason for exclusion was variations in measurement of den-tal caries prevalence for both the case and control groups. Therefore, a total of 43 articles [Schamschula et al, 1980;de Muñiz, 1985;del Rio Gomez, 1991;Jones et al, 1992;Rao and Bharambe, 1993;Grim et al, 1994;Davies et al, 1997;Hallett and O'Rourke, 2002;Endean et al, 2004;Schroth et al, 2005;Zeng et al, 2005;Jamieson et al, 2006a, b;Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2007;Jamieson et al, 2007a, b;Brennan et al, 2007;Lawrence et al, 2008;Medina et al, 2008;Gowda et al, 2009;Lawrence et al, 2009;Phelan et al, 2009;Jamieson et al, 2010a, b;Dogar et al, 2011;Foster Page and Murray Thomson, 2011;Page and Thomson, 2011;Singh et al, 2011;Kumar et al, 2013;Kapellas et al, 2014;Drummond et al, 2015;John et al, 2015 2015; Shen et al, 2015;Arrow, 2016;Jamieson et al, 2016a;Schuch et al, 2017;Miranda et al, 2018;Shi et al, 2018;Simangwa et al, 2018;Haag et al, 2020;Arantes et al, 2021] met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review for descriptive analysis. A total of 34 articles were included for meta-analysis...…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%