2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.physe.2013.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density inhomogeneity driven metal–insulator transition in 2D p-GaAs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5. In agreement with the previously obtained data, it increases weakly when the density decreases, being close to the value (B sat )/ (0) = 4 predicted by the theory of spin-polarization-dependent screening of a random potential [17,18].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…5. In agreement with the previously obtained data, it increases weakly when the density decreases, being close to the value (B sat )/ (0) = 4 predicted by the theory of spin-polarization-dependent screening of a random potential [17,18].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…4 and 5, we have obtained values of the exponent close to 1/2 and far from 1/3 which allows us, on the one hand, to exclude the Mott hopping mechanism where the hopping is assisted by phonons [10,[14][15] and, on the other hand, to confirm the existence of the Efros-Shklovskii hopping where the hopping is assisted by electrons. The exponent depends on the density, in fact, the more the density approaches the critical density of the insulator-metal transition which is estimated at n pc = 4.6 × 10 10 cm -2 [6,19], the more the exponent increases and tends towards the value = 1 that is characteristic of a hopping mechanism of the activated type [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the conductivity σ 0 < e 2 h , the system becomes highly localized. On the other hand, in the presence of interactions characterized by the parameter r s = E in /E kin [13][14][15] (E kin is the kinetic energy and E in the interaction energy), only k F l e is a good parameter for characterizing the importance of the disorder. For an electron system of density n in dimension d, k F ∝ n 1/d , and thus the strength of the effective disorder increase as the electron density is decreased.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%