2021
DOI: 10.1002/gps.5567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dementia wellbeing and COVID‐19: Review and expert consensus on current research and knowledge gaps

Abstract: Objectives In response to a commissioned research update on dementia during the COVID‐19 pandemic, a UK‐based working group, comprising dementia researchers from a range of fields and disciplines, aimed to describe the impact of the pandemic on dementia wellbeing and identify priorities for future research. Methods We supplemented a rapid literature search (including unpublished, non‐peer reviewed and ongoing studies/reports) on dementia wellbeing in the context of COVI… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
47
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
(70 reference statements)
1
47
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, conclusions drawn from this review should be interpreted with caution and follow-up systematic reviews with higher quality data are warranted. It is worth noting that evidence provided in this review are in accordance with more recent findings being published on an ongoing basis (e.g., [ 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 ]). Despite these limitations, the current systematic review allowed to highlight the extent of the effects of the pandemic, and the results established should be taken into consideration by healthcare practitioners, institutions, and policymakers to ensure that proper measures are employed to protect this population from additional harm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, conclusions drawn from this review should be interpreted with caution and follow-up systematic reviews with higher quality data are warranted. It is worth noting that evidence provided in this review are in accordance with more recent findings being published on an ongoing basis (e.g., [ 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 ]). Despite these limitations, the current systematic review allowed to highlight the extent of the effects of the pandemic, and the results established should be taken into consideration by healthcare practitioners, institutions, and policymakers to ensure that proper measures are employed to protect this population from additional harm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Considering that this pandemic could be long-lasting and that the mental health of caregivers of patients with cognitive decline/dementia has been demonstrated to be at risk regardless of the COVID-19 emergency (De Fazio et al, 2015;Corrêa et al, 2019;Lloyd et al, 2019), there is a need to investigate the real effects of the current emergency on caregivers of patients with dementia to identify and address adequate interventions (Liu et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caregivers have emphasized person-centered care, staying close to older PWD to carefully understand their facial expressions, conversations, behaviors, and surrounding environment. However, in the wake of COVID-19, social and physical contact between older PWD and their caregivers decreased, and it was difficult for caregivers to implement the same contact-based care as before [ 20 ]. In order to provide continued dementia care and support while adhering to infection control measures for older PWD, family members and formal caregivers such as healthcare and long-term care professionals need to seek best practices and collaborate with each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%