Demanding Recognition

Abstract

This article argues that we must distinguish between two distinct currents in the politics of recognition, one centred on demands for equal respect which is consistent with liberal egalitarianism, and one which centres on demands for esteem made on behalf of particular groups which is at odds with egalitarian aims. A variety of claims associated with the politics of recognition are assessed and it is argued that these are readily accommodated within contemporary liberal egalitarian theory. It is argued that, pace Taylor, much of what passes for `identity' or recognition politics is driven by demands for equal respect, not by demands for esteem/affirmation. Given the inherently hierarchical nature of esteem recognition, no liberal state can consistently grant such recognition. Furthermore, these demands pose the risk of intensifying intergroup competition and chauvinism. Esteem recognition is valuable for individuals, but plays a problematic role for egalitarian politics.

Recognition, conflict and the problem of ethical community

“…In turn, the mutual esteem of the specific properties of individuals and groups serves to define the difference of each subject -their unique personality, interests and abilities -and to register these 'goals and desires' as something of social contribution and worth (Honneth 1995, 122, 169). However, there is contestation over what should count as an achievement or quality of social value (Honneth 1995, 126), and some have indicated the problematic nature of esteem that may intensify group competition and be inconsistent with egalitarianism (see McBride [2009]). …”