2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demand curves for stocks do not slope down: Evidence using an exogenous supply shock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with EMH, some supported that the immediate rise in stock prices is short-termed due to auto-correction of market frictions by the arbitrage forces, flattening the demand curve (Harris and Gurel, 1986). On the other hand, studies supported a gradual and permanent shift in stock prices (Jain et al, 2019). We can observe that literature conflicts on either there is a temporary priceimpact or a permanent price-impact.…”
Section: Review Of Literature and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Consistent with EMH, some supported that the immediate rise in stock prices is short-termed due to auto-correction of market frictions by the arbitrage forces, flattening the demand curve (Harris and Gurel, 1986). On the other hand, studies supported a gradual and permanent shift in stock prices (Jain et al, 2019). We can observe that literature conflicts on either there is a temporary priceimpact or a permanent price-impact.…”
Section: Review Of Literature and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Focusing on large stocks, all three studies present evidence supporting the downward-sloping demand curve hypothesis. In contrast, Jain et al. (2019) report the results consistent with the flat demand curve by examining stock price reactions to the sales of shares by insider blockholders prompted by a regulatory change in India.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…There is an ongoing debate on whether demand curves for stocks slope down. Empirical analyses fromShleifer (1986),Kaul et al (2000),Petajisto (2009) andBuss et al (2021) support this conjecture, but those inCha and Lee (2001) andJain et al (2019) do not Wurgler and Zhuravskaya (2002). conclude that it depends on whether or not the stock has substitutes on the market.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%