2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delivering complex engineering projects: Reexamining organizational control theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cardinal 2001;Melnyk et al 2014;Tessier and Otley 2012). Other authors, such as Cardinal Liu et al (2014) and Ouchi (1979), have built upon these theoretical foundations. In the organizational control field, authors such as Child (1973), Cyert and March (1963), Thompson (1967) and Woodward (1970) have theorized about organizational control.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundations Of Pmmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cardinal 2001;Melnyk et al 2014;Tessier and Otley 2012). Other authors, such as Cardinal Liu et al (2014) and Ouchi (1979), have built upon these theoretical foundations. In the organizational control field, authors such as Child (1973), Cyert and March (1963), Thompson (1967) and Woodward (1970) have theorized about organizational control.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundations Of Pmmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the organizational control field, authors such as Child (1973), Cyert and March (1963), Thompson (1967) and Woodward (1970) have theorized about organizational control. Other authors, such as Cardinal (2001), Liu et al (2014) and Ouchi (1979), have built upon these theoretical foundations. In a similar vein, management control theories have developed from the management accounting field (e.g.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundations Of Pmmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an organizational context, input control has been described as a regulator of the “antecedent conditions of performance” , meaning that it can be applied to control the “knowledge, skills, abilities, values, and motives of employees” through screening, selection, and development (Snell, , p. 297). Although different forms of input control were considered in varying contexts (eg, Boudreau, ; Cardinal et al, ; Kim & Tiwana, ; Liu, Borman, & Gao, ), the majority of prior IS control studies examined the effects of output, process, and clan control, overlooking the increasing relevance of input control, despite its prevalence in practice (eg, Choudhury & Sabherwal, ; Kirsch et al, ). This neglect of input control in IS research can be attributed to the fact that in traditional IT project management it was not as visibly observed as it is in platform settings (Tiwana, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The project objective, product quality, delivery time and customer cost of the project management are relatively stable, and the risk avoidance, risk bearing or risk transfer strategy can be adopted according to the project type with high probability (Grennberg, 1993). Therefore, the impact of project type on engineering harmony focuses on control in multiple organizations, which plays an indirect regulatory role (Liu, Borman, & Gao, 2014). To sum up, this paper proposes the following hypothesis: H8: the engineering type may influence the positive impact of the risk management objective on engineering harmony.…”
Section: The Basic Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%