2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-0834-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deliberating trade-offs with the future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 176 publications
0
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Temporal discounting may stem partly from the inability of decision makers to perfectly simulate future outcomes 26 . In this paper, we develop a theoretical account of prominent regularities in intertemporal choice, based on the idea that mental simulation of the future is noisy but controllable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporal discounting may stem partly from the inability of decision makers to perfectly simulate future outcomes 26 . In this paper, we develop a theoretical account of prominent regularities in intertemporal choice, based on the idea that mental simulation of the future is noisy but controllable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They thereby reduce the complexity of our experience into simplified models of the world (e.g., about the people we know or about the locations we frequently visit) (8,14). Such models, in turn, foster planning and facilitate adaptive decisions (15)(16)(17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Episodic simulation allows humans to play out the future and optimize intertemporal choices -a ubiquitous form of decision making in humans (Bulley & Schacter, 2020). The present findings demonstrate that episodic future thinking, regardless of the emotional valence of simulated content, promotes patient choices and that imagining positive events enhances this effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…When episodic future thinking increases the salience of one's shortened time horizon or risk of mortality, delaying gratification becomes a less sensible choice. Related to this idea, the degree of controllability of the negative event may play a role; events with a more malleable outcome may be more effective in promoting farsighted behaviour, as doing so could attenuate the degree to which the future yields harm (see e.g., Bulley & Schacter, 2020 for discussions of this idea). In considering alternative interpretations for these incongruous results, it is possible that other study design features are at play, including sample size, which was notably smaller in Liu et al, (2013) and Zhang et al, (2018) relative to the other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%