2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13205-018-1390-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Degradation of cinnamic acid by a newly isolated bacterium Stenotrophomonas sp. TRMK2

Abstract: A bacterium sp. TRMK2 capable of utilizing cinnamic acid was isolated from agro-industrial waste by enrichment culture technique. This strain completely utilizes 5 mM cinnamic acid within 18 h of incubation. The different metabolites formed during the degradation of cinnamic acid were characterized by GC-HRMS. The involvement of various enzymes, namely cinnamate reductase, 3-phenylpropionic acid hydroxylase,-hydroxybenzoic acid hydroxylase and protocatechuate 3,4-dioxygenase in cinnamic acid degradation was de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cinnamic acid is reported to be catabolized by 18 organisms (Fig. 4a), but due to the alternate metabolic routes for its degradation—e.g., via benzoic acid, 3-phenylpropionic acid, or styrene (Chamkha et al 2001; Defnoun et al 2000; Monisha et al 2018; Mäkelä et al 2015)—it was omitted from the prediction model. Also, according to current knowledge, anaerobic aromatic catabolism frequently (but not exclusively) relies on pathways that converge on benzoyl-CoA, that is further subjected to ATP-dependent hydrolysis to open the aromatic ring (Durante-Rodríguez et al 2018; Fuchs et al 2011); but since the exact mechanisms are largely unknown for the species in the dataset, all anaerobic microbes have been put in an “anaerobic branch (es)” cluster (Fig.…”
Section: Distribution Of Metabolic Pathways and Substrate Specificitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cinnamic acid is reported to be catabolized by 18 organisms (Fig. 4a), but due to the alternate metabolic routes for its degradation—e.g., via benzoic acid, 3-phenylpropionic acid, or styrene (Chamkha et al 2001; Defnoun et al 2000; Monisha et al 2018; Mäkelä et al 2015)—it was omitted from the prediction model. Also, according to current knowledge, anaerobic aromatic catabolism frequently (but not exclusively) relies on pathways that converge on benzoyl-CoA, that is further subjected to ATP-dependent hydrolysis to open the aromatic ring (Durante-Rodríguez et al 2018; Fuchs et al 2011); but since the exact mechanisms are largely unknown for the species in the dataset, all anaerobic microbes have been put in an “anaerobic branch (es)” cluster (Fig.…”
Section: Distribution Of Metabolic Pathways and Substrate Specificitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our result was consonant with the work of Elslahi et al, Meena et al, and Mishra et al ,, On the contrary, no significant bacterial growth inhibition was observed upon treatment with selected phytochemicals in all concentrations. Though the exact mechanism of the survival strategy of the bacteria in presence of the phytochemicals was not investigated in the present study, previous literature suggested that several soil borne bacteria have the potential to degrade those phytochemicals. The result advocated the acceptability of the combinatorial phytochemicals in the preservation of stored pulses in a sustainable manner.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…These acids are part of the phenylpropanoid family, which unites a wide range of C 6 –C 3 aromatic compounds synthesized by plants from the amino acid phenylalanine and serve as an integral element of various natural polymers, in particular lignin. Bacterial catabolism of these compounds plays an important role in the carbon cycle by which both natural aromatics and many industrial pollutants are degraded [ 77 ]. The complete set of enzymes of these pathways is specific to the AR_OL41 strain because the enzyme 3-carboxyethylcatechol 2,3-dioxygenase (EC: 1.13.11.16) is absent in the genomes of other reference type strains of the genus Sphingomonas ( Figure S6 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%