2010
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrd.2010.2043859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Definitions and Applications of Dynamic Average Models for Analysis of Power Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
139
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
139
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However [23], and more recently with specific systems-level considerations [24][25][26], there is no existing technique which is both readily compatible with the network models developed and offers full multimode operation that could be employed. As such, the lowest acceptable level of fidelity for the VFAC and hybrid AC/DC network models is the behavioral level.…”
Section: Modelling Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However [23], and more recently with specific systems-level considerations [24][25][26], there is no existing technique which is both readily compatible with the network models developed and offers full multimode operation that could be employed. As such, the lowest acceptable level of fidelity for the VFAC and hybrid AC/DC network models is the behavioral level.…”
Section: Modelling Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the simulation of asymmetric fault and waveform distortion, the non-fundamental component is generated, and the simulation result is not accurate enough. Based on the time-varying Fourier coefficients, the dynamic phasors method is used to model LCC-HVDC [4][5][6][7]. This model can reflect the dynamic behavior of the system, but it is an average-value model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, MMC models are developed with a pre-determined modeling outcome in mind. Low-order average-value models are inherently unable to capture transients of high frequencies, and detailed models naturally include as much detail as possible within the simulation bandwidth [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%