Definition of Internal Mammary Node Target Volume Based on the Position of the Internal Mammary Sentinel Lymph Nodes Presented on SPECT/CT Fusion Images

Abstract

Purpose: Mapping the distribution of internal mammary sentinel lymph nodes (IM-SLNs) presented on single photon emission computed tomography in conjunction with computed tomography (SPECT/CT) images to explore the value of IM-SLN to guide tailored clinical target volume (CTV) delineation of postoperative prophylactic IMNI. Materials and methods: Ninety-seven patients who underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy by SPECT/CT and had imaging of IM-SLN were selected in this study. The imaging IM-SLNs on SPECT/CT of eligible patients were projected onto corresponding anatomical positions of a representative axial CT image. The IMN CTVs were delineated on the representative axial CT images according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) guideline, and defined as CTV RTOG and CTV DBCG. The location of the IM-SLNs was compared with the RTOG and DBCG guidelines of IMN target volume delineations, respectively. The intercostal space distribution of IM-SLNs was recorded. The distances from the CTV RTOG and CTV DBCG to the IM-SLNs were measured, respectively. Results: The total number of imaging IM-SLNs was 136. IM-SLNs were mostly found in the first intercostal space (40.4%), with 30.2, 24.3, 4.4, and 0.7% of IM-SLNs in the second, third, fourth, and fifth intercostal space, respectively. The average distance from the edge of the CTV RTOG and the edge of CTV DBCG to the central points of the IM-SLNs was 4.10 mm (SD, 3.3 mm) and 1.60 mm (SD, 2.6 mm), respectively (t = 16.640, P = 0.000). The average distance from the edge of CTV RTOG and the edge of CTV DBCG to the lateral border IM-SLN was 6.40 mm (SD, 3.5 mm) and 3.34 mm (SD, 3.3 mm), respectively (t = 19.815, P = 0.000). Only 18.4% of IM-SLN central points were included in the CTV RTOG , and 60.3% of IM-SLN central points were included in the CTV DBCG. When covering 90 and 100% of the IM-SLN center points, the CTV RTOG needs to expand 8 and 15 mm, respectively, and the CTV DBCG needs to expand 5 and 13 mm, respectively.

Radiation Oncology-Future Vision for the Modern Radiation Oncologist

“…This will support the care of the patient as part of survivorship models moving forward. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35] The Future Radiation Oncologist Radiation oncology has become a different specialty since the first generation of trainees began practice more than 50 years ago. Managing patient care had fewer administrative layers and expectations of both the physicians and patients were different.…”

Radiation Oncology: Future Vision for Quality Assurance and Data Management in Clinical Trials and Translational Science

“…A new initiative is being developed to house patient care data in a uniform format to develop programs in artificial intelligence in both our clinics and translational science laboratories. We understand that artificial intelligence will only be successful if built on strong datasets with complete information, otherwise we will be committed to continue to make the mistakes of the past limiting our credibility with colleagues from other disciplines (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37).…”

Radiation Oncology: Contouring for Patients with Primary Breast Cancer for Clinical Protocol Compliance

“…Investigators evaluating SPECT/CT imaging have demonstrated the importance of the first intercostal space as a site of interest for the internal mammary system supporting the strategy to draw the medial supraclavicular area and the internal mammary system as a continuum or a continuous volume (Wang et al, 2020).…”