The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1999
DOI: 10.1109/77.784971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defects in YBCO relevant for RF superconductivity: T-, f- and H-dependencies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite those similarities in the resonance curves the TEoll-Nb-cavities yield convex Rs(Hd) dependencies shown in Fig. 5 or [3], [7], whereas the TEol I-dielectric cavity yields typically concave Rs(H,f> dependencies. This difference has been obtained even for one identical film, shown in Fig.…”
Section: DCmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Despite those similarities in the resonance curves the TEoll-Nb-cavities yield convex Rs(Hd) dependencies shown in Fig. 5 or [3], [7], whereas the TEol I-dielectric cavity yields typically concave Rs(H,f> dependencies. This difference has been obtained even for one identical film, shown in Fig.…”
Section: DCmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…(4) with Hc(0) L-1 T. As shown above and in [1], [3], [5], [7] nonlinearities occur at H* = 0.1 mT. This can be explained by the low Hell = H* fields typical for Josephson fluxon penetration [3] , [7] fitting to R,,(T,f) [ll]. Extripic no?linearities are either due to defects with lowered T, and H, (T) or due to new degrees of freedom in the superconductor being active at GHz.…”
Section: B Residual Rf Losses and Nonlinearities Z(h)mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations