The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2008
DOI: 10.1116/1.2834557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defects in Ge and Si caused by 1MeV Si+ implantation

Abstract: Cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy was used to study defect formation and evolution in the ͑001͒ Ge and Si wafers implanted with 1 MeV Si + and 40 keV Si + at a dose of 1 ϫ 10 14 cm −2 . As expected, upon annealing, the ͕311͖ extended defects form and subsequently dissolve at the projected range for nonamorphizing implants into Si. However, in Ge, no ͕311͖ defect formation is observed for this nonamorphizing implant after annealing at temperatures between 350 and 850°C. Instead, for the MeV impla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Full recrystallization, however, was achieved by a 450°C anneal, while residual crystal damage was observed below the original a/c interface, agreeing with Ref. 15.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Full recrystallization, however, was achieved by a 450°C anneal, while residual crystal damage was observed below the original a/c interface, agreeing with Ref. 15.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…The advantage of this technique with respect to the microscopy approach is twofold: (a) it does not require any preparation, avoiding the possible introduction of artifacts [12] and, (b) if their concentration is high enough, it is also sensitive to point defects invisible to TEM [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples may not have been subjected to a sufficient thermal budget to allow the formation of extended defects or if already formed, they may be very small and high in concentration which limits the ability to view individual defects. 42 With increasing annealing temperature, the contrast associated with the damaged lattice decreases which suggests that the damage has been reduced. In Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%