2013
DOI: 10.1890/es12-00141.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deer density and disease prevalence influence transmission of chronic wasting disease in white‐tailed deer

Abstract: Abstract. Host-parasite dynamics and strategies for managing infectious diseases of wildlife depend on the functional relationship between disease transmission rates and host density. However, the disease transmission function is rarely known for free-living wildlife, leading to uncertainty regarding the impacts of diseases on host populations and effective control actions. We evaluated the influence of deer density, landscape features, and soil clay content on transmission of chronic wasting disease (CWD) in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
77
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
4
77
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our projections of CWD dynamics are limited because we cannot account for these unknown, but potentially important, effects on transmission due to accumulation of infectious prions in the environment over time. Two recent evaluations of the potential effects of soil characteristics (specifically clay content) on CWD transmission to yearling deer and on spatial patterns of CWD prevalence in Wisconsin [44], [46] failed to show an association between soil characteristics and CWD, unlike a similar study from Colorado [68]. While there is no current evidence supporting a significant role for environmental CWD transmission in Wisconsin, we cannot discount the possible influence this may have on future CWD dynamics in our study system.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our projections of CWD dynamics are limited because we cannot account for these unknown, but potentially important, effects on transmission due to accumulation of infectious prions in the environment over time. Two recent evaluations of the potential effects of soil characteristics (specifically clay content) on CWD transmission to yearling deer and on spatial patterns of CWD prevalence in Wisconsin [44], [46] failed to show an association between soil characteristics and CWD, unlike a similar study from Colorado [68]. While there is no current evidence supporting a significant role for environmental CWD transmission in Wisconsin, we cannot discount the possible influence this may have on future CWD dynamics in our study system.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…It has been suspected that FD was a dominant transmission mechanism in mule deer [5], [17]; [ but see 6], and more recently in white-tailed deer [28], [46]. Furthermore, our modeling results suggest a more recent and biologically plausible time since CWD introduction in south-central Wisconsin compared with earlier analysis [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proportion of hemoplasma-infected raccoons was greater on the undisturbed than on the urbanized island, and the proportion of hemoplasma-infected raccoons in both locations was higher than in urban cats. If hemoplasma transmission is population density dependent, an increase in hemoplasma infection in urbanized habitats is expected (55,56). We did not see evidence of this, because trapping success on the urban island (0.41 animals/trap night) was higher than on the protected island (0.24 animals/trap night).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…These results suggest that patterns of aggregation related to both within-and between-group transmission may be increasing the spread of B. abortus among elk. Such complex transmission mechanisms may occur, for example, in animals with distinct social groups that are highly connected due to group-group contact and between-group movement of certain individuals (e.g., Craft et al 2011), and may explain wildlife systems where the prevalence of disease is not described well by a linear relationship with host density (e.g., Smith et al 2009, Storm et al 2013. However, few studies have evaluated and compared the effects of density and group size measured at multiple scales or examined the relationship between density of a large mammal and rate of increase in pathogen seroprevalence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%