2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transmission of Chronic Wasting Disease in Wisconsin White-Tailed Deer: Implications for Disease Spread and Management

Abstract: Few studies have evaluated the rate of infection or mode of transmission for wildlife diseases, and the implications of alternative management strategies. We used hunter harvest data from 2002 to 2013 to investigate chronic wasting disease (CWD) infection rate and transmission modes, and address how alternative management approaches affect disease dynamics in a Wisconsin white-tailed deer population. Uncertainty regarding demographic impacts of CWD on cervid populations, human and domestic animal health concer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
102
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(129 reference statements)
8
102
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern was reported for whitetailed deer in Wisconsin (Heisey et al 2010, Jennelle et al 2014, Samuel and Storm 2016 and Illinois (Samuel and Storm 2016), for mule deer in Colorado (Miller and Conner 2005, Miller et al 2008, Wolfe et al 2018 and Wyoming (DeVivo et al 2017), and for mule deer and white-tailed deer pooled in Saskatchewan, Canada (Rees et al 2012). This pattern was reported for whitetailed deer in Wisconsin (Heisey et al 2010, Jennelle et al 2014, Samuel and Storm 2016 and Illinois (Samuel and Storm 2016), for mule deer in Colorado (Miller and Conner 2005, Miller et al 2008, Wolfe et al 2018 and Wyoming (DeVivo et al 2017), and for mule deer and white-tailed deer pooled in Saskatchewan, Canada (Rees et al 2012).…”
Section: Infection Pattern and Mode Of Transmissionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This pattern was reported for whitetailed deer in Wisconsin (Heisey et al 2010, Jennelle et al 2014, Samuel and Storm 2016 and Illinois (Samuel and Storm 2016), for mule deer in Colorado (Miller and Conner 2005, Miller et al 2008, Wolfe et al 2018 and Wyoming (DeVivo et al 2017), and for mule deer and white-tailed deer pooled in Saskatchewan, Canada (Rees et al 2012). This pattern was reported for whitetailed deer in Wisconsin (Heisey et al 2010, Jennelle et al 2014, Samuel and Storm 2016 and Illinois (Samuel and Storm 2016), for mule deer in Colorado (Miller and Conner 2005, Miller et al 2008, Wolfe et al 2018 and Wyoming (DeVivo et al 2017), and for mule deer and white-tailed deer pooled in Saskatchewan, Canada (Rees et al 2012).…”
Section: Infection Pattern and Mode Of Transmissionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Therefore, the demographic patterns of parasites and disease may influence their impact on population dynamics (Miller et al 2007). The harvesting of males can lead to more stable population dynamics under the threat of CWD (Jennelle et al 2014), increase disease detection, and limit the risk of geographic spread (Lang and Blanchong 2012). Infected females reproduce at close to normal rates until the late disease stages (Dulberger et al 2010; hence, the effect of CWD on reproduction is expected to have a weaker impact on population dynamics.…”
Section: Implications Of the Demographic Infection Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Jennelle et al. ). For age‐specific alternatives, we considered different infection and disease mortality rates for young deer (fawns and yearlings) and adults (>2 yr).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Jennelle et al. , Monello et al. ), possible human and livestock health issues, and potential economic consequences have led to management concerns about how to control CWD distribution and prevalence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the potential for environmental transmission was only accounted for in two studies [22, 23] and seasonal effects were only considered in three of the six studies [20, 21, 25]. This discussion highlights the variability in model structure and parameter assumptions and echoes the challenges regarding the most appropriate CWD transmission coefficient also encountered by other authors including Jennelle et al [24] and Potapov et al [23]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%